CMGIX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (CMGIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
CMGIX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 27, 1996. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
CMGIX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CMGIX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMGIX BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio | -8.46% | 0.49% | 12.44% | 28.24% | -37.36% | 14.51% | 46.13% | 36.19% | 2.88% | 34.59% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMGIX achieves a -8.46% return, which is significantly lower than FASGX's -2.99% return. Over the past 10 years, CMGIX has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 10.94%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
CMGIX
- 1D
- -2.34%
- 1M
- -11.71%
- YTD
- -8.46%
- 6M
- -13.16%
- 1Y
- 6.17%
- 3Y*
- 6.01%
- 5Y*
- -0.87%
- 10Y*
- 10.94%
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CMGIX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMGIX has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CMGIX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
CMGIX
FASGX
CMGIX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (CMGIX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CMGIX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.22 | 1.21 | -0.99 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.50 | 1.73 | -1.23 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.06 | 1.26 | -0.19 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.10 | 1.55 | -1.45 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.32 | 6.89 | -6.57 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CMGIX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.22 | 1.21 | -0.99 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | 0.53 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.70 | -0.22 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.38 | 0.60 | -0.22 |
Correlation
The correlation between CMGIX and FASGX is 0.86, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CMGIX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
CMGIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 23.16%, more than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMGIX BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio | 23.16% | 21.20% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.94% | 0.00% | 0.39% | 4.72% | 3.31% | 0.00% | 2.57% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
CMGIX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMGIX drawdown since its inception was -73.85%, which is greater than FASGX's maximum drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMGIX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMGIX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -73.85% | -47.35% | -26.50% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.90% | -9.07% | -5.83% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -45.96% | -23.54% | -22.42% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -45.96% | -27.20% | -18.76% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -22.37% | -7.95% | -14.42% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -28.76% | -6.74% | -22.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.72% | 2.04% | +2.68% |
Volatility
CMGIX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
BlackRock Mid-Cap Growth Equity Portfolio (CMGIX) has a higher volatility of 8.49% compared to Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) at 4.57%. This indicates that CMGIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FASGX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CMGIX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.49% | 4.57% | +3.92% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.53% | 7.78% | +8.75% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.80% | 12.82% | +12.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.95% | 12.14% | +12.81% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 23.29% | 12.56% | +10.73% |