CMBT vs. NMM
CMBT (Cmb.Tech NV) and NMM (Navios Maritime Partners L.P.) are both stocks. CMBT operates in Oil & Gas Midstream (Energy), while NMM operates in Marine Shipping (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, CMBT returned 13.00%/yr vs 16.63%/yr for NMM. At a 0.37 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CMBT vs. NMM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CMBT achieves a 75.48% return, which is significantly higher than NMM's 38.56% return. Over the past 10 years, CMBT has underperformed NMM with an annualized return of 13.00%, while NMM has yielded a comparatively higher 16.63% annualized return.
CMBT
- 1D
- 4.52%
- 1M
- -1.26%
- YTD
- 75.48%
- 6M
- 78.43%
- 1Y
- 81.69%
- 3Y*
- 10.83%
- 5Y*
- 19.35%
- 10Y*
- 13.00%
NMM
- 1D
- 0.96%
- 1M
- -2.67%
- YTD
- 38.56%
- 6M
- 40.76%
- 1Y
- 85.59%
- 3Y*
- 51.94%
- 5Y*
- 21.15%
- 10Y*
- 16.63%
CMBT vs. NMM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMBT Cmb.Tech NV | 75.48% | -2.30% | -35.19% | 17.73% | 93.21% | 12.61% | -24.34% | 83.37% | -24.03% | 20.60% |
NMM Navios Maritime Partners L.P. | 38.56% | 21.68% | 55.59% | 8.61% | 4.18% | 125.91% | -34.68% | 57.42% | -62.79% | 67.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMBT and NMM is 0.67, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.67 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.44 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.38 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 23, 2015 | 0.37 |
Over the past year, CMBT and NMM have become more correlated (0.67) than their long-term average of 0.37, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
CMBT:
$4.63B
NMM:
$2.12B
CMBT:
$1.91
NMM:
$11.86
CMBT:
8.37
NMM:
6.12
CMBT:
2.07
NMM:
1.52
CMBT:
1.57
NMM:
0.62
CMBT:
$1.95B
NMM:
$1.40B
CMBT:
$698.20M
NMM:
$919.38M
CMBT:
$1.01B
NMM:
$708.29M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMBT vs. NMM — Risk / Return Rank
CMBT
NMM
CMBT vs. NMM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cmb.Tech NV (CMBT) and Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NMM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMBT | NMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.71 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.88 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.41 | -0.10 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.19 | 4.60 | -0.41 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.56 | 16.68 | -7.13 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMBT vs. NMM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMBT drawdown since its inception was -57.21%, smaller than the maximum NMM drawdown of -98.13%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMBT and NMM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMBT | NMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -57.21% | -98.13% | +40.92% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -19.58% | -18.69% | -0.89% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -57.21% | -53.75% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -57.21% | -53.75% | -3.46% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -57.21% | -87.93% | +30.72% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.32% | -64.27% | +56.95% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -25.17% | -58.84% | +33.67% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 8.58% | 5.16% | +3.42% |
Volatility
CMBT vs. NMM - Volatility Comparison
Cmb.Tech NV (CMBT) has a higher volatility of 12.21% compared to Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NMM) at 8.55%. This indicates that CMBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than NMM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMBT | NMM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 12.21% | 8.55% | +3.66% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 29.57% | 25.69% | +3.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 41.91% | 32.29% | +9.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.12% | 41.89% | +1.23% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 41.03% | 54.76% | -13.73% |
Dividends
CMBT vs. NMM - Dividend Comparison
CMBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.64%, more than NMM's 0.29% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CMBT Cmb.Tech NV | 5.64% | 0.52% | 25.18% | 12.23% | 0.70% | 1.35% | 20.75% | 0.96% | 1.73% | 3.03% | 17.23% | 6.35% |
NMM Navios Maritime Partners L.P. | 0.29% | 0.38% | 0.46% | 0.72% | 0.77% | 0.80% | 6.25% | 6.44% | 7.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 50.99% |
Financials
CMBT vs. NMM - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Cmb.Tech NV and Navios Maritime Partners L.P.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
CMBT vs. NMM - Profitability Comparison
CMBT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cmb.Tech NV reported a gross profit of 176.90M and revenue of 513.16M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 34.5%.
NMM - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Navios Maritime Partners L.P. reported a gross profit of 244.43M and revenue of 357.01M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 68.5%.
CMBT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cmb.Tech NV reported an operating income of 149.46M and revenue of 513.16M, resulting in an operating margin of 29.1%.
NMM - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Navios Maritime Partners L.P. reported an operating income of 125.60M and revenue of 357.01M, resulting in an operating margin of 35.2%.
CMBT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Cmb.Tech NV reported a net income of 364.24M and revenue of 513.16M, resulting in a net margin of 71.0%.
NMM - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Navios Maritime Partners L.P. reported a net income of 106.34M and revenue of 357.01M, resulting in a net margin of 29.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
CMBT and NMM have a correlation of 0.67, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CMBT has higher volatility (12.21%) compared to NMM (8.55%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CMBT dropped -57.21% vs NMM's -98.13%.
NMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.67 vs 1.96), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CMBT and NMM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer