NMM vs. QQQ
NMM (Navios Maritime Partners L.P.) is a stock, while QQQ (Invesco QQQ ETF) is Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the NASDAQ-100 Index. Over the past 10 years, NMM returned 17.36%/yr vs 20.44%/yr for QQQ. Their 0.28 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
NMM vs. QQQ - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, NMM achieves a 54.29% return, which is significantly higher than QQQ's 12.26% return. Over the past 10 years, NMM has underperformed QQQ with an annualized return of 17.36%, while QQQ has yielded a comparatively higher 20.44% annualized return.
NMM
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- 11.44%
- 6M
- 35.25%
- YTD
- 54.29%
- 1Y
- 94.40%
- 3Y*
- 51.37%
- 5Y*
- 30.19%
- 10Y*
- 17.36%
- ALL TIME*
- -0.63%
QQQ
- 1D
- 0.65%
- 1M
- -3.45%
- 6M
- 10.89%
- YTD
- 12.26%
- 1Y
- 24.81%
- 3Y*
- 22.29%
- 5Y*
- 14.23%
- 10Y*
- 20.44%
- ALL TIME*
- 10.64%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $10.17M | $8.75M | $9.44M | |
| $30.32B | $28.40B | $31.45B |
NMM vs. QQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMM Navios Maritime Partners L.P. | 54.29% | 21.68% | 55.59% | 8.61% | 4.18% | 125.91% | -34.68% | 57.42% | -62.79% | 67.38% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 12.26% | 20.77% | 25.58% | 54.86% | -32.58% | 27.42% | 48.62% | 38.96% | -0.13% | 32.66% |
Correlation
The correlation between NMM and QQQ is 0.19, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.19 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.25 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.29 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.25 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 13, 2007 | 0.28 |
The correlation between NMM and QQQ shifts across timeframes, from 0.19 (1 year) to 0.29 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
NMM vs. QQQ — Risk / Return Rank
NMM
QQQ
NMM vs. QQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NMM) and Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| NMM | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.87 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +2.18 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.21 | +0.24 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 5.25 | 1.88 | +3.37 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 18.33 | 6.00 | +12.33 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
NMM vs. QQQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum NMM drawdown since its inception was -98.13%, which is greater than QQQ's maximum drawdown of -82.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMM and QQQ.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| NMM | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -98.13% | -82.97% | -15.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.69% | -11.96% | -6.73% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.75% | -22.77% | -30.98% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.75% | -35.12% | -18.63% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -87.93% | -35.12% | -52.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -60.21% | -7.69% | -52.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -58.86% | -32.62% | -26.24% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 5.34% | 3.74% | +1.60% |
Volatility
NMM vs. QQQ - Volatility Comparison
Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NMM) has a higher volatility of 9.89% compared to Invesco QQQ ETF (QQQ) at 6.87%. This indicates that NMM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| NMM | QQQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.89% | 6.87% | +3.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 26.58% | 16.08% | +10.50% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 32.43% | 19.38% | +13.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 41.14% | 22.90% | +18.24% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 54.42% | 22.50% | +31.92% |
Dividends
NMM vs. QQQ - Dividend Comparison
NMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.26%, less than QQQ's 0.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
NMM Navios Maritime Partners L.P. | 0.26% | 0.38% | 0.46% | 0.72% | 0.77% | 0.80% | 6.25% | 6.44% | 7.06% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 50.99% |
QQQ Invesco QQQ ETF | 0.44% | 0.45% | 0.56% | 0.62% | 0.80% | 0.43% | 0.55% | 0.74% | 0.91% | 0.84% | 1.06% | 0.99% |
Frequently Asked Questions
NMM and QQQ have a correlation of 0.19, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
NMM has higher volatility (9.89%) compared to QQQ (6.87%). In terms of maximum drawdown, NMM dropped -98.13% vs QQQ's -82.97%.
NMM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.03 vs 1.16), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for NMM and QQQ
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer