PortfoliosLab logo
NMM vs. ZIM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between NMM and ZIM is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Performance

NMM vs. ZIM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NMM) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

NMM:

-0.46

ZIM:

0.32

Sortino Ratio

NMM:

-0.45

ZIM:

0.95

Omega Ratio

NMM:

0.95

ZIM:

1.12

Calmar Ratio

NMM:

-0.22

ZIM:

0.37

Martin Ratio

NMM:

-0.69

ZIM:

1.22

Ulcer Index

NMM:

27.06%

ZIM:

18.42%

Daily Std Dev

NMM:

41.22%

ZIM:

77.80%

Max Drawdown

NMM:

-98.13%

ZIM:

-84.68%

Current Drawdown

NMM:

-80.77%

ZIM:

-37.17%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

NMM:

$1.15B

ZIM:

$2.08B

EPS

NMM:

$11.98

ZIM:

$19.52

PE Ratio

NMM:

3.26

ZIM:

0.88

PS Ratio

NMM:

0.87

ZIM:

0.23

PB Ratio

NMM:

0.37

ZIM:

0.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

NMM:

$1.02B

ZIM:

$8.87B

Gross Profit (TTM)

NMM:

$678.48M

ZIM:

$3.09B

EBITDA (TTM)

NMM:

$550.86M

ZIM:

$3.33B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NMM achieves a -9.29% return, which is significantly lower than ZIM's -1.14% return.


NMM

YTD

-9.29%

1M

14.32%

6M

-18.93%

1Y

-18.92%

3Y*

10.17%

5Y*

43.74%

10Y*

-10.51%

ZIM

YTD

-1.14%

1M

13.68%

6M

15.42%

1Y

24.64%

3Y*

-9.91%

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Navios Maritime Partners L.P.

Go deeper with the Portfolio Analysis tool — backtest performance, assess risk, compare to benchmarks, and more

Risk-Adjusted Performance

NMM vs. ZIM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NMM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of NMM is 2828
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of NMM is 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of NMM is 2323
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of NMM is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of NMM is 3737
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of NMM is 3535
Martin Ratio Rank

ZIM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of ZIM is 6464
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of ZIM is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of ZIM is 6464
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of ZIM is 6262
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of ZIM is 6868
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of ZIM is 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

NMM vs. ZIM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NMM) and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


The current NMM Sharpe Ratio is -0.46, which is lower than the ZIM Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NMM and ZIM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading data...

Go to the full Sharpe Ratio tool to analyze any stock or portfolio. Customize time frames, set your own risk-free rate, and more

Dividends

NMM vs. ZIM - Dividend Comparison

NMM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.51%, less than ZIM's 45.73% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
NMM
Navios Maritime Partners L.P.
0.51%0.46%0.72%0.77%0.80%6.25%6.44%7.06%0.00%0.00%51.06%17.42%
ZIM
ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.
45.73%22.40%64.84%160.27%7.65%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

NMM vs. ZIM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NMM drawdown since its inception was -98.13%, which is greater than ZIM's maximum drawdown of -84.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NMM and ZIM.


Loading data...

Go to the full Drawdowns tool for more analysis options, including inflation-adjusted drawdowns, and more

Volatility

NMM vs. ZIM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Navios Maritime Partners L.P. (NMM) is 8.56%, while ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. (ZIM) has a volatility of 22.29%. This indicates that NMM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ZIM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading data...

Financials

NMM vs. ZIM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Navios Maritime Partners L.P. and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.001.00B2.00B3.00B4.00B20212022202320242025
332.52M
2.01B
(NMM) Total Revenue
(ZIM) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

NMM vs. ZIM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Navios Maritime Partners L.P. and ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%20.0%40.0%60.0%20212022202320242025
66.6%
26.6%
(NMM) Gross Margin
(ZIM) Gross Margin
NMM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Navios Maritime Partners L.P. reported a gross profit of 221.49M and revenue of 332.52M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 66.6%.

ZIM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a gross profit of 533.20M and revenue of 2.01B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 26.6%.

NMM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Navios Maritime Partners L.P. reported an operating income of 108.75M and revenue of 332.52M, resulting in an operating margin of 32.7%.

ZIM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported an operating income of 466.70M and revenue of 2.01B, resulting in an operating margin of 23.3%.

NMM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Navios Maritime Partners L.P. reported a net income of 94.72M and revenue of 332.52M, resulting in a net margin of 28.5%.

ZIM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, ZIM Integrated Shipping Services Ltd. reported a net income of 295.30M and revenue of 2.01B, resulting in a net margin of 14.7%.