CMBO vs. CSHI

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

CMBO (Wayfinder Dynamic U.S. Interest Rate ETF) and CSHI (Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. CMBO is actively managed, while CSHI is passively managed. At a correlation of -0.05, they often move in opposite directions. CMBO charges 0.15%/yr vs 0.38%/yr for CSHI.

Performance

CMBO vs. CSHI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wayfinder Dynamic U.S. Interest Rate ETF (CMBO) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMBO achieves a 1.63% return, which is significantly lower than CSHI's 2.10% return.

CMBO

• 1D: 0.04%
• 1M: 0.33%
• YTD: 1.63%
• 6M: 1.95%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CSHI

• 1D: -0.20%
• 1M: 0.17%
• YTD: 2.10%
• 6M: 2.44%
• 1Y: 5.04%
• 3Y*: 5.38%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMBO vs. CSHI - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CMBO Wayfinder Dynamic U.S. Interest Rate ETF	1.63%	0.52%
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF	2.10%	0.73%

Correlation

The correlation between CMBO and CSHI is -0.05, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 5, 2025	-0.05

Return for Risk

CMBO vs. CSHI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CSHI

CSHI Risk / Return Rank: 99
CSHI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CSHI Sortino Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Omega Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
CSHI Martin Ratio Rank: 99

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMBO vs. CSHI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wayfinder Dynamic U.S. Interest Rate ETF (CMBO) and Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF (CSHI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CMBO	CSHI	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	5.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	9.91	4.13	+5.78

Drawdowns

CMBO vs. CSHI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMBO drawdown since its inception was -0.22%, smaller than the maximum CSHI drawdown of -1.69%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMBO and CSHI.

Drawdown Indicators

	CMBO	CSHI	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-0.22%	-1.69%	+1.47%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-0.20%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-1.69%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	-0.20%	+0.20%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-0.01%	-0.03%	+0.02%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	0.04%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CMBO	CSHI	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	0.25%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	0.57%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.38%	0.88%	-0.50%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	0.38%	1.33%	-0.95%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	0.38%	1.33%	-0.95%

CMBO vs. CSHI - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMBO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than CSHI's 0.38% expense ratio.

Dividends

CMBO vs. CSHI - Dividend Comparison

CMBO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CSHI's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.91%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CMBO Wayfinder Dynamic U.S. Interest Rate ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CSHI Neos Enhanced Income Cash Alternative ETF	4.91%	5.11%	5.72%	6.15%	1.52%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CMBO and CSHI in my portfolio?

CMBO and CSHI have a correlation of -0.05, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CMBO or CSHI?

On fees, CMBO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CMBO or CSHI?

CMBO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.38% for CSHI.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CMBO or CSHI?

CSHI has the higher dividend yield at 4.91%, compared with 0.00% for CMBO.

What is the main difference between CMBO and CSHI?

They also come from different issuers: Wayfinder and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CMBO and 0.38% for CSHI.