PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CMBO vs. BUCK
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CMBO vs. BUCK - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Wayfinder Dynamic U.S. Interest Rate ETF (CMBO) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CMBO achieves a 1.82% return, which is significantly lower than BUCK's 2.29% return.


CMBO

1D
0.01%
1M
0.32%
YTD
1.82%
6M
1.91%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

BUCK

1D
0.17%
1M
0.38%
YTD
2.29%
6M
2.48%
1Y
6.70%
3Y*
5.30%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CMBO vs. BUCK - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CMBO and BUCK is 0.11, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025

0.11

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CMBO vs. BUCK — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CMBO

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.


BUCK
BUCK Risk / Return Rank: 8787
Overall Rank
BUCK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BUCK Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
BUCK Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
BUCK Calmar Ratio Rank: 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
BUCK Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CMBO vs. BUCK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wayfinder Dynamic U.S. Interest Rate ETF (CMBO) and Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF (BUCK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMBOBUCKDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.49

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

5.14

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

27.77

CMBO vs. BUCK - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CMBO vs. BUCK - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CMBO drawdown since its inception was -0.22%, smaller than the maximum BUCK drawdown of -5.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMBO and BUCK.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMBOBUCKDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-0.22%

-5.43%

+5.21%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-1.31%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-5.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

0.00%

0.00%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.01%

-0.49%

+0.48%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.24%

Volatility

CMBO vs. BUCK - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMBOBUCKDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

1.38%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.37%

2.98%

-2.61%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

0.37%

3.46%

-3.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

0.37%

3.46%

-3.09%

CMBO vs. BUCK - Expense Ratio Comparison

CMBO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than BUCK's 0.35% expense ratio.


Dividends

CMBO vs. BUCK - Dividend Comparison

CMBO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while BUCK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.39%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
BUCK
Simplify Treasury Option Income ETF
7.39%7.59%8.84%4.84%0.59%
CMBO
Wayfinder Dynamic U.S. Interest Rate ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CMBO and BUCK have a correlation of 0.11, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CMBO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CMBO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for BUCK.

BUCK has the higher dividend yield at 7.39%, compared with 0.00% for CMBO.

CMBO is categorized as Ultrashort Bond, while BUCK is Government Bonds. They also come from different issuers: Wayfinder and Simplify. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CMBO and 0.35% for BUCK.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CMBO and BUCK

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer