CMBO vs. YFYA
CMBO (Wayfinder Dynamic U.S. Interest Rate ETF) and YFYA (Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF) are both Ultrashort Bond funds. Both are actively managed. Their 0.06 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. CMBO charges 0.15%/yr vs 1.16%/yr for YFYA.
Performance
CMBO vs. YFYA - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CMBO having a 2.34% return and YFYA slightly higher at 2.40%.
CMBO
- 1D
- 0.01%
- 1M
- 0.44%
- 6M
- 2.03%
- YTD
- 2.34%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- —
YFYA
- 1D
- 0.36%
- 1M
- 0.51%
- 6M
- 1.60%
- YTD
- 2.40%
- 1Y
- 4.43%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 3.28%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $56.15K | $49.04K | $31.26K | |
| $115.78K | $95.47K | $137.11K |
CMBO vs. YFYA - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
CMBO Wayfinder Dynamic U.S. Interest Rate ETF | 2.34% | 0.55% |
YFYA Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF | 2.40% | 0.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between CMBO and YFYA is 0.06, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 2025 | 0.06 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CMBO vs. YFYA — Risk / Return Rank
CMBO
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
YFYA
CMBO vs. YFYA - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Wayfinder Dynamic U.S. Interest Rate ETF (CMBO) and Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF (YFYA). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CMBO | YFYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.31 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.76 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 10.82 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CMBO vs. YFYA - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CMBO drawdown since its inception was -0.22%, smaller than the maximum YFYA drawdown of -2.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CMBO and YFYA.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CMBO | YFYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -0.22% | -2.29% | +2.07% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -1.61% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.01% | -0.36% | +0.35% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 0.41% | — |
Volatility
CMBO vs. YFYA - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CMBO | YFYA | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 0.69% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 3.42% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.35% | 3.61% | -3.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 0.35% | 3.49% | -3.14% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 0.35% | 3.49% | -3.14% |
CMBO vs. YFYA - Expense Ratio Comparison
CMBO has a 0.15% expense ratio, which is lower than YFYA's 1.16% expense ratio.
Dividends
CMBO vs. YFYA - Dividend Comparison
CMBO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while YFYA's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.19%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
CMBO Wayfinder Dynamic U.S. Interest Rate ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
YFYA Yields for You Income Strategy A ETF | 5.19% | 3.67% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CMBO and YFYA have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CMBO is cheaper at 0.15% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CMBO is cheaper with a 0.15% expense ratio, compared with 1.16% for YFYA.
YFYA has the higher dividend yield at 5.19%, compared with 0.00% for CMBO.
They also come from different issuers: Wayfinder and Teucrium. Their fees differ too: 0.15% for CMBO and 1.16% for YFYA.
Find the right allocation for CMBO and YFYA
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer