PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CM vs. FN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CM vs. FN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) and Fabrinet (FN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CM achieves a 24.28% return, which is significantly lower than FN's 26.02% return. Over the past 10 years, CM has underperformed FN with an annualized return of 17.15%, while FN has yielded a comparatively higher 31.23% annualized return.


CM

1D
-1.05%
1M
-3.29%
YTD
24.28%
6M
22.27%
1Y
67.98%
3Y*
43.12%
5Y*
20.06%
10Y*
17.15%

FN

1D
-1.82%
1M
-18.48%
YTD
26.02%
6M
20.67%
1Y
115.55%
3Y*
64.45%
5Y*
44.47%
10Y*
31.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CM vs. FN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CM
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
24.28%49.02%37.83%27.23%-25.71%42.29%9.25%19.22%-19.75%26.58%
FN
Fabrinet
26.02%107.06%15.53%48.44%8.23%52.69%19.66%26.37%78.78%-28.78%

Correlation

The correlation between CM and FN is 0.30, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.30

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.34

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2010

0.32

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CM:

$75.95B

FN:

$20.78B

EPS

CM:

CA$12.14

FN:

$11.65

PE Ratio

CM:

13.01

FN:

49.26

PEG Ratio

CM:

1.61

FN:

2.11

PS Ratio

CM:

2.07

FN:

4.90

PB Ratio

CM:

1.84

FN:

9.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

CM:

CA$61.84B

FN:

$4.24B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CM:

CA$28.74B

FN:

$509.75M

EBITDA (TTM)

CM:

CA$13.01B

FN:

$422.55M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CM vs. FN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CM
CM Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
CM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CM Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
CM Omega Ratio Rank: 9696
Omega Ratio Rank
CM Calmar Ratio Rank: 9595
Calmar Ratio Rank
CM Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

FN
FN Risk / Return Rank: 8686
Overall Rank
FN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8686
Sharpe Ratio Rank
FN Sortino Ratio Rank: 7979
Sortino Ratio Rank
FN Omega Ratio Rank: 7979
Omega Ratio Rank
FN Calmar Ratio Rank: 9292
Calmar Ratio Rank
FN Martin Ratio Rank: 9191
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CM vs. FN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) and Fabrinet (FN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CMFNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.30

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.61

1.29

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

6.43

5.04

+1.39

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

25.18

12.51

+12.67

CM vs. FN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CM Sharpe Ratio is 3.65, which is higher than the FN Sharpe Ratio of 1.74. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CM and FN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CM vs. FN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CM drawdown since its inception was -71.70%, roughly equal to the maximum FN drawdown of -70.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CM and FN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CMFNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.70%

-70.46%

-1.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-10.79%

-23.14%

+12.35%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-19.47%

-37.47%

+18.00%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-40.61%

-38.70%

-1.91%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-47.82%

-51.11%

+3.29%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.53%

-23.14%

+19.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-14.65%

-22.58%

+7.93%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.75%

9.31%

-6.56%

Volatility

CM vs. FN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce (CM) is 7.78%, while Fabrinet (FN) has a volatility of 24.51%. This indicates that CM experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CMFNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.78%

24.51%

-16.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.02%

55.49%

-39.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.03%

67.10%

-48.07%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.41%

53.82%

-32.41%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

22.61%

48.37%

-25.76%

Dividends

CM vs. FN - Dividend Comparison

CM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.65%, while FN has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CM
Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce
2.65%3.17%4.21%5.88%7.77%4.08%5.06%6.47%5.48%5.28%5.93%6.71%
FN
Fabrinet
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

CM vs. FN - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and Fabrinet. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20222023202420252026
15.22B
1.21B
(CM) Total Revenue
(FN) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. CM values in CAD, FN values in USD

CM vs. FN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce and Fabrinet over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%40.0%60.0%80.0%20222023202420252026
48.4%
11.9%
Portfolio components
CM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported a gross profit of 7.36B and revenue of 15.22B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 48.4%.

FN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported a gross profit of 144.34M and revenue of 1.21B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 11.9%.

CM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported an operating income of 3.20B and revenue of 15.22B, resulting in an operating margin of 21.0%.

FN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported an operating income of 120.04M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

CM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Canadian Imperial Bank of Commerce reported a net income of 2.46B and revenue of 15.22B, resulting in a net margin of 16.1%.

FN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Fabrinet reported a net income of 128.18M and revenue of 1.21B, resulting in a net margin of 10.6%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CM and FN have a correlation of 0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

FN has higher volatility (24.51%) compared to CM (7.78%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CM dropped -71.70% vs FN's -70.46%.

CM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.65 vs 1.74), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CM and FN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer