BCGS vs. BCIL
BCGS (Bancreek Global Select ETF) and BCIL (Bancreek International Large Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCGS is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Bancreek, while BCIL is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Bancreek. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.80% expense ratio.
Performance
BCGS vs. BCIL - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BCGS
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 2.63%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCIL
- 1D
- -1.11%
- 1M
- 0.88%
- YTD
- 6.33%
- 6M
- 7.29%
- 1Y
- -0.68%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCGS vs. BCIL - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BCGS Bancreek Global Select ETF | 6.44% |
BCIL Bancreek International Large Cap ETF | 9.60% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCGS and BCIL is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2026 | 0.90 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCGS vs. BCIL — Risk / Return Rank
BCGS
BCIL
BCGS vs. BCIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS) and Bancreek International Large Cap ETF (BCIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCGS | BCIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.04 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.39 | 0.53 | +0.86 |
Drawdowns
BCGS vs. BCIL - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCGS drawdown since its inception was -7.43%, smaller than the maximum BCIL drawdown of -16.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCGS and BCIL.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCGS | BCIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.43% | -16.18% | +8.75% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -16.18% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.25% | -4.07% | +1.82% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.24% | -4.29% | +2.05% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.05% | — |
Volatility
BCGS vs. BCIL - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCGS | BCIL | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 6.46% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 14.14% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.77% | 16.35% | +5.42% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 16.20% | +5.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 16.20% | +5.57% |
BCGS vs. BCIL - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both BCGS and BCIL have an expense ratio of 0.80%.
Dividends
BCGS vs. BCIL - Dividend Comparison
BCGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than BCIL's 1.00% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BCGS Bancreek Global Select ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BCIL Bancreek International Large Cap ETF | 1.00% | 1.25% | 0.77% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.90, BCGS and BCIL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
Both ETFs have the same 0.80% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCGS and BCIL have the same expense ratio: 0.80% per year.
BCIL has the higher dividend yield at 1.00%, compared with 0.02% for BCGS.
BCGS is categorized as Global Equities, while BCIL is Foreign Large Cap Equities.
Find the right allocation for BCGS and BCIL
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer