BCGS vs. BCIL

Last updated Jun 25, 2026

BCGS (Bancreek Global Select ETF) and BCIL (Bancreek International Large Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCGS is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Bancreek, while BCIL is a Foreign Large Cap Equities fund actively managed by Bancreek. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.90 suggests significant overlap in exposure. Both charge a 0.80% expense ratio.

Performance

BCGS vs. BCIL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS) and Bancreek International Large Cap ETF (BCIL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

BCGS

• 1D: -0.25%
• 1M: 3.67%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

BCIL

• 1D: -0.53%
• 1M: 1.77%
• YTD: 7.38%
• 6M: 6.23%
• 1Y: -0.02%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

BCGS vs. BCIL - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
BCGS Bancreek Global Select ETF	8.30%
BCIL Bancreek International Large Cap ETF	11.05%

Correlation

The correlation between BCGS and BCIL is 0.90, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 9, 2026	0.90

Return for Risk

BCGS vs. BCIL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

BCGS

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

BCIL

BCIL Risk / Return Rank: 9
BCIL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9
BCIL Sortino Ratio Rank: 8
BCIL Omega Ratio Rank: 9
BCIL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
BCIL Martin Ratio Rank: 9

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

BCGS vs. BCIL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS) and Bancreek International Large Cap ETF (BCIL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	BCGS	BCIL	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	-0.00	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.13	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.02	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	-0.00	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	-0.00	—

Drawdowns

BCGS vs. BCIL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum BCGS drawdown since its inception was -7.43%, smaller than the maximum BCIL drawdown of -16.18%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCGS and BCIL.

Drawdown Indicators

	BCGS	BCIL	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-7.43%	-16.18%	+8.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-16.18%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-2.62%	-3.60%	+0.98%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.12%	-4.28%	+2.16%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.11%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	BCGS	BCIL	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	8.51%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	16.05%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	22.51%	17.92%	+4.59%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	22.51%	16.81%	+5.70%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	22.51%	16.81%	+5.70%

BCGS vs. BCIL - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both BCGS and BCIL have an expense ratio of 0.80%.

Dividends

BCGS vs. BCIL - Dividend Comparison

BCGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than BCIL's 0.99% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024
BCGS Bancreek Global Select ETF	0.02%	0.00%	0.00%
BCIL Bancreek International Large Cap ETF	0.99%	1.25%	0.77%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both BCGS and BCIL in my portfolio?

With a correlation of 0.90, BCGS and BCIL move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.

Which ETF is better, BCGS or BCIL?

Both ETFs have the same 0.80% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, BCGS or BCIL?

BCGS and BCIL have the same expense ratio: 0.80% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, BCGS or BCIL?

BCIL has the higher dividend yield at 0.99%, compared with 0.02% for BCGS.

What is the main difference between BCGS and BCIL?

BCGS is categorized as Global Equities, while BCIL is Foreign Large Cap Equities.