BCGS vs. BCUS
BCGS (Bancreek Global Select ETF) and BCUS (Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - BCGS is a Global Equities fund actively managed by Bancreek, while BCUS is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Bancreek. Both are actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. BCGS charges 0.80%/yr vs 0.70%/yr for BCUS.
Performance
BCGS vs. BCUS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
BCGS
- 1D
- -0.75%
- 1M
- 2.63%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCUS
- 1D
- -0.72%
- 1M
- 3.44%
- YTD
- 10.83%
- 6M
- 10.63%
- 1Y
- 14.30%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
BCGS vs. BCUS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
BCGS Bancreek Global Select ETF | 6.44% |
BCUS Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF | 8.86% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCGS and BCUS is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 10, 2026 | 0.86 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCGS vs. BCUS — Risk / Return Rank
BCGS
BCUS
BCGS vs. BCUS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Bancreek Global Select ETF (BCGS) and Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF (BCUS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCGS | BCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.01 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.39 | 1.00 | +0.39 |
Drawdowns
BCGS vs. BCUS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCGS drawdown since its inception was -7.43%, smaller than the maximum BCUS drawdown of -18.14%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCGS and BCUS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCGS | BCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -7.43% | -18.14% | +10.71% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.81% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.25% | -0.72% | -1.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.24% | -2.92% | +0.68% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 2.53% | — |
Volatility
BCGS vs. BCUS - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCGS | BCUS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 5.34% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 12.11% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.77% | 14.29% | +7.48% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 16.20% | +5.57% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 21.77% | 16.20% | +5.57% |
BCGS vs. BCUS - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCGS has a 0.80% expense ratio, which is higher than BCUS's 0.70% expense ratio.
Dividends
BCGS vs. BCUS - Dividend Comparison
BCGS's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.02%, less than BCUS's 0.32% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 |
|---|---|---|---|
BCGS Bancreek Global Select ETF | 0.02% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
BCUS Bancreek U.S. Large Cap ETF | 0.32% | 0.49% | 0.23% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCGS and BCUS have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, BCUS is cheaper at 0.70% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
BCUS is cheaper with a 0.70% expense ratio, compared with 0.80% for BCGS.
BCUS has the higher dividend yield at 0.32%, compared with 0.02% for BCGS.
BCGS is categorized as Global Equities, while BCUS is Large Cap Blend Equities. Their fees differ too: 0.80% for BCGS and 0.70% for BCUS.
Find the right allocation for BCGS and BCUS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer