CLSZ vs. QQQP
CLSZ (Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF) and QQQP (Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLSZ is a Inverse Equities fund tracking the CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK), while QQQP is a Leveraged Equities fund actively managed by Tradr. CLSZ is passively managed, while QQQP is actively managed. At a correlation of -0.59, they often move in opposite directions. CLSZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.30%/yr for QQQP.
Performance
CLSZ vs. QQQP - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLSZ
- 1D
- 0.00%
- 1M
- 13.47%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QQQP
- 1D
- 1.21%
- 1M
- -3.70%
- YTD
- 26.71%
- 6M
- 22.68%
- 1Y
- 56.57%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLSZ vs. QQQP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLSZ Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF | -82.67% |
QQQP Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF | 31.33% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLSZ and QQQP is -0.59, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026 | -0.59 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLSZ vs. QQQP — Risk / Return Rank
CLSZ
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
QQQP
CLSZ vs. QQQP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF (CLSZ) and Tradr 2X Long Triple Q Quarterly ETF (QQQP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLSZ | QQQP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.27 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 2.24 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 8.01 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLSZ vs. QQQP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLSZ drawdown since its inception was -87.62%, which is greater than QQQP's maximum drawdown of -42.50%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSZ and QQQP.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLSZ | QQQP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.62% | -42.50% | -45.12% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -25.35% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -82.67% | -7.05% | -75.62% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -53.69% | -7.27% | -46.42% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 7.09% | — |
Volatility
CLSZ vs. QQQP - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLSZ | QQQP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 15.33% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 27.52% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 139.63% | 34.52% | +105.11% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 139.63% | 44.33% | +95.30% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 139.63% | 44.33% | +95.30% |
CLSZ vs. QQQP - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLSZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than QQQP's 1.30% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLSZ vs. QQQP - Dividend Comparison
Neither CLSZ nor QQQP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
CLSZ and QQQP have a correlation of -0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, QQQP is cheaper at 1.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
QQQP is cheaper with a 1.30% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for CLSZ.
CLSZ and QQQP have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
CLSZ is categorized as Inverse Equities, while QQQP is Leveraged Equities. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for CLSZ and 1.30% for QQQP.
Find the right allocation for CLSZ and QQQP
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer