CLSZ vs. SARK
CLSZ (Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF) and SARK (Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. CLSZ is passively managed, while SARK is actively managed. A 0.68 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLSZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.75%/yr for SARK.
Performance
CLSZ vs. SARK - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLSZ
- 1D
- 13.82%
- 1M
- -26.48%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SARK
- 1D
- 7.13%
- 1M
- 5.63%
- YTD
- -2.68%
- 6M
- 3.52%
- 1Y
- -32.77%
- 3Y*
- -29.15%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLSZ vs. SARK - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLSZ Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF | -78.94% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | -6.64% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLSZ and SARK is 0.68, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2026 | 0.68 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLSZ vs. SARK — Risk / Return Rank
CLSZ
SARK
CLSZ vs. SARK - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF (CLSZ) and Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF (SARK). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLSZ | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | -0.90 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | -0.22 | -0.45 |
Drawdowns
CLSZ vs. SARK - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLSZ drawdown since its inception was -87.06%, which is greater than SARK's maximum drawdown of -81.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSZ and SARK.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLSZ | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.06% | -81.07% | -5.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -35.35% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -74.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.64% | -78.52% | -3.12% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.24% | -46.52% | +2.28% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 30.63% | — |
Volatility
CLSZ vs. SARK - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLSZ | SARK | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.92% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 25.90% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 148.64% | 36.71% | +111.93% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 148.64% | 56.30% | +92.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 148.64% | 56.30% | +92.34% |
CLSZ vs. SARK - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLSZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SARK's 0.75% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLSZ vs. SARK - Dividend Comparison
CLSZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SARK's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.90%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLSZ Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SARK Tradr Short Innovation Daily ETF | 2.90% | 2.82% | 15.49% | 12.57% | 25.22% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLSZ and SARK have a correlation of 0.68, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SARK is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SARK is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for CLSZ.
SARK has the higher dividend yield at 2.90%, compared with 0.00% for CLSZ.
They also come from different issuers: Tradr and AXS. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for CLSZ and 0.75% for SARK.
Find the right allocation for CLSZ and SARK
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer