PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLSZ vs. CARD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLSZ vs. CARD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF (CLSZ) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CLSZ

1D
13.82%
1M
-26.48%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CARD

1D
6.19%
1M
-1.41%
YTD
2.62%
6M
6.48%
1Y
-37.79%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSZ vs. CARD - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between CLSZ and CARD is 0.57, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2026

0.57

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLSZ vs. CARD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSZ

CARD
CARD Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CARD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CARD Sortino Ratio Rank: 55
Sortino Ratio Rank
CARD Omega Ratio Rank: 55
Omega Ratio Rank
CARD Calmar Ratio Rank: 33
Calmar Ratio Rank
CARD Martin Ratio Rank: 44
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLSZ vs. CARD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF (CLSZ) and Max Auto Industry -3X Inverse Leveraged ETN (CARD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CLSZ vs. CARD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLSZCARDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.55

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.67

-0.64

-0.03

Drawdowns

CLSZ vs. CARD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSZ drawdown since its inception was -87.06%, smaller than the maximum CARD drawdown of -93.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSZ and CARD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLSZCARDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-87.06%

-93.51%

+6.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-49.57%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-81.64%

-92.29%

+10.65%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-44.24%

-68.20%

+23.96%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

34.14%

Volatility

CLSZ vs. CARD - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLSZCARDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.85%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

49.91%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

148.64%

68.83%

+79.81%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

148.64%

80.51%

+68.13%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

148.64%

80.51%

+68.13%

CLSZ vs. CARD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than CARD's 0.95% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLSZ vs. CARD - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLSZ nor CARD has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CLSZ and CARD have a correlation of 0.57, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CARD is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CARD is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for CLSZ.

CLSZ and CARD have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

CLSZ tracks CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK), while CARD tracks Prime Auto Industry Index - Benchmark TR Net (--300%). They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Max. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for CLSZ and 0.95% for CARD.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLSZ and CARD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer