CLSZ vs. SEF
CLSZ (Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF) and SEF (ProShares Short Financials) are both Inverse Equities funds - CLSZ tracks the CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) while SEF tracks the Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLSZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.95%/yr for SEF.
Performance
CLSZ vs. SEF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLSZ
- 1D
- 13.82%
- 1M
- -26.48%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
SEF
- 1D
- -0.08%
- 1M
- -0.46%
- YTD
- 6.07%
- 6M
- 3.83%
- 1Y
- 0.06%
- 3Y*
- -10.89%
- 5Y*
- -5.70%
- 10Y*
- -11.70%
CLSZ vs. SEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLSZ Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF | -78.94% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 0.38% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLSZ and SEF is 0.28, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2026 | 0.28 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLSZ vs. SEF — Risk / Return Rank
CLSZ
SEF
CLSZ vs. SEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF (CLSZ) and ProShares Short Financials (SEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLSZ | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.32 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.57 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | -0.49 | -0.18 |
Drawdowns
CLSZ vs. SEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLSZ drawdown since its inception was -87.06%, smaller than the maximum SEF drawdown of -96.51%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSZ and SEF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLSZ | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.06% | -96.51% | +9.45% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -9.72% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -39.40% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -41.62% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -75.66% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.64% | -96.19% | +14.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.24% | -82.72% | +38.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 5.19% | — |
Volatility
CLSZ vs. SEF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLSZ | SEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 3.98% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 11.08% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 148.64% | 14.54% | +134.10% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 148.64% | 17.99% | +130.65% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 148.64% | 20.53% | +128.11% |
CLSZ vs. SEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLSZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than SEF's 0.95% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLSZ vs. SEF - Dividend Comparison
CLSZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SEF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLSZ Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
SEF ProShares Short Financials | 3.44% | 4.33% | 5.72% | 4.43% | 0.39% | 0.00% | 0.12% | 1.25% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLSZ and SEF have a correlation of 0.28, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, SEF is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
SEF is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for CLSZ.
SEF has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 0.00% for CLSZ.
CLSZ tracks CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK), while SEF tracks Dow Jones U.S. Financials Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Tradr and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for CLSZ and 0.95% for SEF.
Find the right allocation for CLSZ and SEF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer