CLSZ vs. PLTZ

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

CLSZ (Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF) and PLTZ (Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. CLSZ is passively managed, while PLTZ is actively managed. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLSZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.29%/yr for PLTZ.

Performance

CLSZ vs. PLTZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF (CLSZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CLSZ

• 1D: 13.82%
• 1M: -26.48%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

PLTZ

• 1D: 8.60%
• 1M: -11.35%
• YTD: 14.08%
• 6M: 15.33%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSZ vs. PLTZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CLSZ Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF	-78.94%
PLTZ Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF	-24.51%

Correlation

The correlation between CLSZ and PLTZ is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2026	0.27

Return for Risk

CLSZ vs. PLTZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF (CLSZ) and Defiance Daily Target 2X Short PLTR ETF (PLTZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLSZ	PLTZ	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.67	-0.59	-0.09

Drawdowns

CLSZ vs. PLTZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSZ drawdown since its inception was -87.06%, which is greater than PLTZ's maximum drawdown of -70.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSZ and PLTZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLSZ	PLTZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.06%	-70.28%	-16.78%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-81.64%	-59.38%	-22.26%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.24%	-52.09%	+7.85%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLSZ	PLTZ	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	148.64%	101.97%	+46.67%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	148.64%	101.97%	+46.67%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	148.64%	101.97%	+46.67%

CLSZ vs. PLTZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than PLTZ's 1.29% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLSZ vs. PLTZ - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLSZ nor PLTZ has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLSZ and PLTZ in my portfolio?

CLSZ and PLTZ have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLSZ or PLTZ?

On fees, PLTZ is cheaper at 1.29% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLSZ or PLTZ?

PLTZ is cheaper with a 1.29% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for CLSZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLSZ or PLTZ?

CLSZ and PLTZ have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CLSZ and PLTZ?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Defiance. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for CLSZ and 1.29% for PLTZ.