CLSZ vs. MSFD
CLSZ (Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF) and MSFD (Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds - CLSZ tracks the CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) while MSFD tracks the Microsoft Corporation (-100%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLSZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for MSFD.
Performance
CLSZ vs. MSFD - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLSZ
- 1D
- 13.82%
- 1M
- -26.48%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
MSFD
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -1.55%
- YTD
- 13.15%
- 6M
- 13.29%
- 1Y
- 10.90%
- 3Y*
- -6.61%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLSZ vs. MSFD - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLSZ Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF | -78.94% |
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares | -5.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLSZ and MSFD is 0.24, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2026 | 0.24 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLSZ vs. MSFD — Risk / Return Rank
CLSZ
MSFD
CLSZ vs. MSFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF (CLSZ) and Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLSZ | MSFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 0.43 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.67 | -0.49 | -0.19 |
Drawdowns
CLSZ vs. MSFD - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLSZ drawdown since its inception was -87.06%, which is greater than MSFD's maximum drawdown of -59.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSZ and MSFD.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLSZ | MSFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -87.06% | -59.90% | -27.16% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -23.25% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -40.50% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -81.64% | -48.97% | -32.67% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -44.24% | -41.61% | -2.63% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 8.22% | — |
Volatility
CLSZ vs. MSFD - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLSZ | MSFD | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 10.51% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 22.07% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 148.64% | 25.46% | +123.18% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 148.64% | 26.16% | +122.48% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 148.64% | 26.16% | +122.48% |
CLSZ vs. MSFD - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLSZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than MSFD's 1.06% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLSZ vs. MSFD - Dividend Comparison
CLSZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.76%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLSZ Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares | 2.76% | 3.33% | 4.46% | 4.43% | 0.74% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLSZ and MSFD have a correlation of 0.24, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, MSFD is cheaper at 1.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
MSFD is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for CLSZ.
MSFD has the higher dividend yield at 2.76%, compared with 0.00% for CLSZ.
CLSZ tracks CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK), while MSFD tracks Microsoft Corporation (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for CLSZ and 1.06% for MSFD.
Find the right allocation for CLSZ and MSFD
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer