CLSZ vs. MSFD

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CLSZ (Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF) and MSFD (Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares) are both Inverse Equities funds - CLSZ tracks the CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) while MSFD tracks the Microsoft Corporation (-100%). Both are passively managed. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLSZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 1.06%/yr for MSFD.

Performance

CLSZ vs. MSFD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF (CLSZ) and Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CLSZ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 13.47%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

MSFD

• 1D: 3.57%
• 1M: 16.76%
• YTD: 33.23%
• 6M: 34.63%
• 1Y: 37.35%
• 3Y*: -1.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSZ vs. MSFD - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CLSZ Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF	-82.67%
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares	11.51%

Correlation

The correlation between CLSZ and MSFD is 0.26, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026	0.26

Return for Risk

CLSZ vs. MSFD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

MSFD

MSFD Risk / Return Rank: 43
MSFD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
MSFD Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
MSFD Omega Ratio Rank: 48
MSFD Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
MSFD Martin Ratio Rank: 37

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLSZ vs. MSFD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF (CLSZ) and Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares (MSFD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLSZ	MSFD	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	1.42	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	2.16	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.27	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	1.61	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	5.23	—

Drawdowns

CLSZ vs. MSFD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSZ drawdown since its inception was -87.62%, which is greater than MSFD's maximum drawdown of -59.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSZ and MSFD.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLSZ	MSFD	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.62%	-59.90%	-27.72%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-23.25%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-40.50%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-82.67%	-39.91%	-42.76%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.69%	-41.61%	-12.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	7.17%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLSZ	MSFD	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	11.90%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	22.99%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	139.63%	26.44%	+113.19%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	139.63%	26.30%	+113.33%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	139.63%	26.30%	+113.33%

CLSZ vs. MSFD - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than MSFD's 1.06% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLSZ vs. MSFD - Dividend Comparison

CLSZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while MSFD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.97%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CLSZ Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
MSFD Direxion Daily MSFT Bear 1X Shares	2.97%	3.33%	4.46%	4.43%	0.74%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLSZ and MSFD in my portfolio?

CLSZ and MSFD have a correlation of 0.26, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLSZ or MSFD?

On fees, MSFD is cheaper at 1.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLSZ or MSFD?

MSFD is cheaper with a 1.06% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for CLSZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLSZ or MSFD?

MSFD has the higher dividend yield at 2.97%, compared with 0.00% for CLSZ.

What is the main difference between CLSZ and MSFD?

CLSZ tracks CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK), while MSFD tracks Microsoft Corporation (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Tradr and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for CLSZ and 1.06% for MSFD.