CLSZ vs. HDGE

Last updated Jun 26, 2026

CLSZ (Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF) and HDGE (AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds. CLSZ is passively managed, while HDGE is actively managed. At a 0.39 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLSZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 3.36%/yr for HDGE.

Performance

CLSZ vs. HDGE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF (CLSZ) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CLSZ

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 13.47%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

HDGE

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: -0.71%
• YTD: 5.31%
• 6M: 6.30%
• 1Y: 2.13%
• 3Y*: -4.04%
• 5Y*: -1.96%
• 10Y*: -15.56%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSZ vs. HDGE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CLSZ Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF	-82.67%
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF	1.32%

Correlation

The correlation between CLSZ and HDGE is 0.39, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 19, 2026	0.39

Return for Risk

CLSZ vs. HDGE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

HDGE

HDGE Risk / Return Rank: 10
HDGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 11
HDGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
HDGE Omega Ratio Rank: 10
HDGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 11
HDGE Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLSZ vs. HDGE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF (CLSZ) and AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF (HDGE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLSZ	HDGE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	—	0.12	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	—	0.30	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	—	1.03	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	—	0.17	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	—	0.36	—

Drawdowns

CLSZ vs. HDGE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSZ drawdown since its inception was -87.62%, smaller than the maximum HDGE drawdown of -93.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSZ and HDGE.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLSZ	HDGE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.62%	-93.88%	+6.26%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-12.26%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-29.46%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-42.97%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-83.33%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-82.67%	-93.09%	+10.42%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-53.69%	-70.18%	+16.49%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	6.00%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLSZ	HDGE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.88%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	13.03%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	139.63%	18.22%	+121.41%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	139.63%	24.19%	+115.44%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	139.63%	23.49%	+116.14%

CLSZ vs. HDGE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is lower than HDGE's 3.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLSZ vs. HDGE - Dividend Comparison

CLSZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while HDGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.32%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CLSZ Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
HDGE AdvisorShares Ranger Equity Bear ETF	3.32%	3.50%	7.83%	9.58%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.22%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLSZ and HDGE in my portfolio?

CLSZ and HDGE have a correlation of 0.39, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLSZ or HDGE?

On fees, CLSZ is cheaper at 1.49% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLSZ or HDGE?

CLSZ is cheaper with a 1.49% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for HDGE.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLSZ or HDGE?

HDGE has the higher dividend yield at 3.32%, compared with 0.00% for CLSZ.

What is the main difference between CLSZ and HDGE?

They also come from different issuers: Tradr and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for CLSZ and 3.36% for HDGE.