CLSZ vs. EMTY

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

CLSZ (Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF) and EMTY (ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF) are both Inverse Equities funds - CLSZ tracks the CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) while EMTY tracks the Solactive-ProShares Bricks and Mortar Retail Store Index (-100%). Both are passively managed. A 0.50 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLSZ charges 1.49%/yr vs 0.66%/yr for EMTY.

Performance

CLSZ vs. EMTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF (CLSZ) and ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CLSZ

• 1D: 13.82%
• 1M: -26.48%
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EMTY

• 1D: -0.49%
• 1M: 3.78%
• YTD: 1.48%
• 6M: 5.12%
• 1Y: 1.35%
• 3Y*: -4.19%
• 5Y*: -2.80%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSZ vs. EMTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CLSZ Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF	-78.94%
EMTY ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF	12.25%

Correlation

The correlation between CLSZ and EMTY is 0.50, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 20, 2026	0.50

Return for Risk

CLSZ vs. EMTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

EMTY

EMTY Risk / Return Rank: 10
EMTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
EMTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
EMTY Omega Ratio Rank: 10
EMTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
EMTY Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLSZ vs. EMTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF (CLSZ) and ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF (EMTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLSZ	EMTY	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	0.08	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	-0.13	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	-0.67	-0.43	-0.25

Drawdowns

CLSZ vs. EMTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSZ drawdown since its inception was -87.06%, which is greater than EMTY's maximum drawdown of -77.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSZ and EMTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLSZ	EMTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-87.06%	-77.62%	-9.44%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-14.00%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-30.83%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-30.83%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-81.64%	-74.67%	-6.97%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-44.24%	-54.03%	+9.79%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	8.12%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLSZ	EMTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	5.79%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	12.39%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	148.64%	17.65%	+130.99%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	148.64%	22.36%	+126.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	148.64%	25.66%	+122.98%

CLSZ vs. EMTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSZ has a 1.49% expense ratio, which is higher than EMTY's 0.66% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLSZ vs. EMTY - Dividend Comparison

CLSZ has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EMTY's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.44%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CLSZ Tradr 2X Short CLSK Daily ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EMTY ProShares Decline of the Retail Store ETF	3.44%	3.83%	6.00%	4.41%	0.65%	0.00%	0.07%	0.82%	0.62%	0.03%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLSZ and EMTY in my portfolio?

CLSZ and EMTY have a correlation of 0.50, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLSZ or EMTY?

On fees, EMTY is cheaper at 0.66% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLSZ or EMTY?

EMTY is cheaper with a 0.66% expense ratio, compared with 1.49% for CLSZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLSZ or EMTY?

EMTY has the higher dividend yield at 3.44%, compared with 0.00% for CLSZ.

What is the main difference between CLSZ and EMTY?

CLSZ tracks CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK), while EMTY tracks Solactive-ProShares Bricks and Mortar Retail Store Index (-100%). They also come from different issuers: Tradr and ProShares. Their fees differ too: 1.49% for CLSZ and 0.66% for EMTY.