PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLSX vs. CIFG
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLSX vs. CIFG - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF (CLSX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

The year-to-date returns for both investments are quite close, with CLSX having a 78.75% return and CIFG slightly higher at 80.86%.


CLSX

1D
-9.03%
1M
47.38%
YTD
78.75%
6M
-25.11%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

CIFG

1D
-5.97%
1M
23.71%
YTD
80.86%
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSX vs. CIFG - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CLSX
Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF
78.75%-55.99%
CIFG
Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF
80.86%-42.39%

Correlation

The correlation between CLSX and CIFG is 0.74, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 12, 2025

0.74

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLSX vs. CIFG - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF (CLSX) and Leverage Shares 2X Long CIFR Daily ETF (CIFG). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CLSX vs. CIFG - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLSXCIFGDifference

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.01

0.04

-0.06

Drawdowns

CLSX vs. CIFG - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSX drawdown since its inception was -93.16%, which is greater than CIFG's maximum drawdown of -71.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSX and CIFG.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLSXCIFGDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.16%

-71.71%

-21.45%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-74.67%

-6.30%

-68.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.38%

-37.74%

-31.64%

Volatility

CLSX vs. CIFG - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLSXCIFGDifference

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

192.48%

203.21%

-10.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

192.48%

203.21%

-10.73%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

192.48%

203.21%

-10.73%

CLSX vs. CIFG - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSX has a 1.30% expense ratio, which is higher than CIFG's 0.75% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLSX vs. CIFG - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLSX nor CIFG has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions


CLSX and CIFG have a correlation of 0.74, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CIFG is cheaper at 0.75% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CIFG is cheaper with a 0.75% expense ratio, compared with 1.30% for CLSX.

CLSX and CIFG have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

They also come from different issuers: Tradr ETFs and Leverage Shares. Their fees differ too: 1.30% for CLSX and 0.75% for CIFG.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLSX and CIFG

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer