CLSX vs. UNX

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CLSX (Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF) and UNX (Tradr 2X Long U Daily ETF) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Tradr ETFs. Both are actively managed. At a 0.32 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. Both charge a 1.30% expense ratio.

Performance

CLSX vs. UNX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF (CLSX) and Tradr 2X Long U Daily ETF (UNX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSX achieves a 86.30% return, which is significantly higher than UNX's -78.48% return.

CLSX

• 1D: 2.27%
• 1M: 13.36%
• YTD: 86.30%
• 6M: 28.46%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

UNX

• 1D: -2.21%
• 1M: 7.84%
• YTD: -78.48%
• 6M: -80.41%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSX vs. UNX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CLSX Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF	86.30%	-35.55%
UNX Tradr 2X Long U Daily ETF	-78.48%	-21.32%

Correlation

The correlation between CLSX and UNX is 0.32, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2025	0.32

Return for Risk

CLSX vs. UNX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tradr 2X Long CLSK Daily ETF (CLSX) and Tradr 2X Long U Daily ETF (UNX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Drawdowns

CLSX vs. UNX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSX drawdown since its inception was -93.16%, roughly equal to the maximum UNX drawdown of -92.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSX and UNX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLSX	UNX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-93.16%	-92.59%	-0.57%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-73.60%	-83.16%	+9.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-69.40%	-56.08%	-13.32%

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLSX	UNX	Difference
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	190.93%	155.64%	+35.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	190.93%	155.64%	+35.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	190.93%	155.64%	+35.29%

CLSX vs. UNX - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CLSX and UNX have an expense ratio of 1.30%.

Dividends

CLSX vs. UNX - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLSX nor UNX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLSX and UNX in my portfolio?

CLSX and UNX have a correlation of 0.32, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLSX or UNX?

Both ETFs have the same 1.30% expense ratio. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLSX or UNX?

CLSX and UNX have the same expense ratio: 1.30% per year.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLSX or UNX?

CLSX and UNX have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.