CLSM vs. SFTY

Last updated Jul 14, 2026

CLSM (Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF) and SFTY (Horizon Managed Risk ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. Over the past year, CLSM returned 25.23% vs 21.14% for SFTY. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CLSM charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.77%/yr for SFTY.

Performance

CLSM vs. SFTY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM) and Horizon Managed Risk ETF (SFTY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSM achieves a 15.94% return, which is significantly higher than SFTY's 9.81% return.

CLSM

• 1D: -1.38%
• 1M: -1.54%
• 6M: 13.12%
• YTD: 15.94%
• 1Y: 25.23%
• 3Y*: 11.76%
• 5Y*: 3.43%
• 10Y*: —

SFTY

• 1D: -0.71%
• 1M: 1.41%
• 6M: 7.64%
• YTD: 9.81%
• 1Y: 21.14%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSM vs. SFTY - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CLSM Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF	15.94%	9.81%
SFTY Horizon Managed Risk ETF	9.81%	12.10%

Correlation

The correlation between CLSM and SFTY is 0.89, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.89
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 26, 2025	0.89

The correlation between CLSM and SFTY has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.89 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

Return for Risk

CLSM vs. SFTY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSM

CLSM Risk / Return Rank: 70
CLSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 70
CLSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 65
CLSM Omega Ratio Rank: 68
CLSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 74
CLSM Martin Ratio Rank: 74

SFTY

SFTY Risk / Return Rank: 68
SFTY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 69
SFTY Sortino Ratio Rank: 67
SFTY Omega Ratio Rank: 68
SFTY Calmar Ratio Rank: 62
SFTY Martin Ratio Rank: 75

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLSM vs. SFTY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM) and Horizon Managed Risk ETF (SFTY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLSM	SFTY	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.79	1.77	+0.02
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	2.46	-0.06
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.32	1.32	0.00
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.98	2.46	+0.52
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	10.94	10.99	-0.06

CLSM vs. SFTY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLSM Sharpe Ratio is 1.79, which is comparable to the SFTY Sharpe Ratio of 1.77. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLSM and SFTY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CLSM vs. SFTY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSM drawdown since its inception was -27.77%, which is greater than SFTY's maximum drawdown of -8.64%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSM and SFTY.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLSM	SFTY	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.77%	-8.64%	-19.13%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.50%	-8.64%	+0.14%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.60%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-27.77%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.11%	-0.71%	-3.40%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.20%	-1.13%	-15.07%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.31%	1.93%	+0.38%

Volatility

CLSM vs. SFTY - Volatility Comparison

Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM) has a higher volatility of 5.68% compared to Horizon Managed Risk ETF (SFTY) at 3.58%. This indicates that CLSM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SFTY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLSM	SFTY	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.68%	3.58%	+2.10%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	12.31%	9.45%	+2.86%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	14.21%	12.03%	+2.18%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.72%	11.90%	+0.82%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.72%	11.90%	+0.82%

CLSM vs. SFTY - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSM has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is higher than SFTY's 0.77% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLSM vs. SFTY - Dividend Comparison

CLSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.78%, more than SFTY's 0.17% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CLSM Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF	0.78%	0.90%	2.13%	2.58%	3.17%	0.59%
SFTY Horizon Managed Risk ETF	0.17%	0.19%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLSM and SFTY in my portfolio?

CLSM and SFTY have a correlation of 0.89, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLSM or SFTY?

CLSM has higher volatility (5.68%) compared to SFTY (3.58%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLSM dropped -27.77% vs SFTY's -8.64%.

Which ETF is better, CLSM or SFTY?

On 1-year performance, CLSM leads with 25.23% vs 21.14% for SFTY. On fees, SFTY is cheaper at 0.77% per year. On volatility, SFTY has been the lower-risk option at 3.58%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CLSM or SFTY?

Over the 1-year period, CLSM has performed better with a 25.23% return vs 21.14%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLSM or SFTY?

SFTY is cheaper with a 0.77% expense ratio, compared with 0.82% for CLSM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLSM or SFTY?

CLSM has the higher dividend yield at 0.78%, compared with 0.17% for SFTY.

What is the main difference between CLSM and SFTY?

They also come from different issuers: Cabana and Horizon. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for CLSM and 0.77% for SFTY.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

CLSM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.79 vs 1.77), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.