CLSM vs. ASGM

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CLSM (Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF) and ASGM (Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. CLSM is passively managed, while ASGM is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CLSM charges 0.82%/yr vs 0.86%/yr for ASGM.

Performance

CLSM vs. ASGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM) and Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF (ASGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSM achieves a 20.91% return, which is significantly lower than ASGM's 23.18% return.

CLSM

• 1D: 0.55%
• 1M: 9.14%
• YTD: 20.91%
• 6M: 20.97%
• 1Y: 35.30%
• 3Y*: 13.89%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ASGM

• 1D: 0.70%
• 1M: 7.18%
• YTD: 23.18%
• 6M: 25.49%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSM vs. ASGM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CLSM Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF	20.91%	7.53%
ASGM Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF	23.18%	11.57%

Correlation

The correlation between CLSM and ASGM is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 6, 2025	0.86

Return for Risk

CLSM vs. ASGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSM

CLSM Risk / Return Rank: 82
CLSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 84
CLSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
CLSM Omega Ratio Rank: 83
CLSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
CLSM Martin Ratio Rank: 84

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLSM vs. ASGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM) and Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF (ASGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLSM	ASGM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.79	—	—
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.68	—	—
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.51	—	—
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.25	—	—
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.62	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLSM	ASGM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.79	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.35	3.02	-2.67

Drawdowns

CLSM vs. ASGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSM drawdown since its inception was -27.77%, which is greater than ASGM's maximum drawdown of -6.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSM and ASGM.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLSM	ASGM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.77%	-6.62%	-21.15%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.50%	-1.22%	-15.28%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.05%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLSM	ASGM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.60%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	10.58%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.70%	15.68%	-2.98%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.47%	15.68%	-3.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.47%	15.68%	-3.21%

CLSM vs. ASGM - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSM has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than ASGM's 0.86% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLSM vs. ASGM - Dividend Comparison

CLSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.74%, less than ASGM's 3.67% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
ASGM Virtus AlphaSimplex Global Macro ETF	3.67%	4.52%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CLSM Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF	0.74%	0.90%	2.13%	2.58%	3.17%	0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLSM and ASGM in my portfolio?

CLSM and ASGM have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLSM or ASGM?

On fees, CLSM is cheaper at 0.82% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLSM or ASGM?

CLSM is cheaper with a 0.82% expense ratio, compared with 0.86% for ASGM.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLSM or ASGM?

ASGM has the higher dividend yield at 3.67%, compared with 0.74% for CLSM.

What is the main difference between CLSM and ASGM?

They also come from different issuers: Cabana and Virtus. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for CLSM and 0.86% for ASGM.