CLSM vs. CEFZ

Last updated Jun 23, 2026

CLSM (Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF) and CEFZ (RiverNorth Active Income ETF) are both Tactical Allocation funds. CLSM is passively managed, while CEFZ is actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. CLSM charges 0.82%/yr vs 3.36%/yr for CEFZ.

Performance

CLSM vs. CEFZ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM) and RiverNorth Active Income ETF (CEFZ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSM achieves a 18.94% return, which is significantly higher than CEFZ's 4.59% return.

CLSM

• 1D: -0.24%
• 1M: 1.70%
• YTD: 18.94%
• 6M: 17.85%
• 1Y: 32.91%
• 3Y*: 14.07%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

CEFZ

• 1D: -0.66%
• 1M: -0.03%
• YTD: 4.59%
• 6M: 5.08%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSM vs. CEFZ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CLSM Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF	18.94%	8.37%
CEFZ RiverNorth Active Income ETF	4.59%	7.41%

Correlation

The correlation between CLSM and CEFZ is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 4, 2025	0.66

Return for Risk

CLSM vs. CEFZ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSM

CLSM Risk / Return Rank: 77
CLSM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 78
CLSM Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
CLSM Omega Ratio Rank: 78
CLSM Calmar Ratio Rank: 78
CLSM Martin Ratio Rank: 80

CEFZ

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLSM vs. CEFZ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF (CLSM) and RiverNorth Active Income ETF (CEFZ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLSM	CEFZ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.40	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.16	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.89	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	15.29	—	—

Drawdowns

CLSM vs. CEFZ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSM drawdown since its inception was -27.77%, which is greater than CEFZ's maximum drawdown of -6.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSM and CEFZ.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLSM	CEFZ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-27.77%	-6.66%	-21.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-8.50%	—	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.60%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.63%	-1.28%	-0.35%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-16.35%	-1.20%	-15.15%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.16%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLSM	CEFZ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.11%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	11.89%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	13.80%	10.42%	+3.38%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.68%	10.42%	+2.26%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.68%	10.42%	+2.26%

CLSM vs. CEFZ - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLSM has a 0.82% expense ratio, which is lower than CEFZ's 3.36% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLSM vs. CEFZ - Dividend Comparison

CLSM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.76%, less than CEFZ's 8.32% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CEFZ RiverNorth Active Income ETF	8.32%	4.17%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
CLSM Cabana Target Leading Sector Moderate ETF	0.76%	0.90%	2.13%	2.58%	3.17%	0.59%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLSM and CEFZ in my portfolio?

CLSM and CEFZ have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLSM or CEFZ?

On fees, CLSM is cheaper at 0.82% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLSM or CEFZ?

CLSM is cheaper with a 0.82% expense ratio, compared with 3.36% for CEFZ.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLSM or CEFZ?

CEFZ has the higher dividend yield at 8.32%, compared with 0.76% for CLSM.

What is the main difference between CLSM and CEFZ?

They also come from different issuers: Cabana and RiverNorth. Their fees differ too: 0.82% for CLSM and 3.36% for CEFZ.