PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLSK vs. PSIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CLSK vs. PSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) and Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLSK achieves a 42.49% return, which is significantly higher than PSIX's -47.67% return. Over the past 10 years, CLSK has underperformed PSIX with an annualized return of -7.95%, while PSIX has yielded a comparatively higher 5.60% annualized return.


CLSK

1D
10.67%
1M
-16.36%
6M
7.85%
YTD
42.49%
1Y
12.83%
3Y*
30.96%
5Y*
-0.11%
10Y*
-7.95%
ALL TIME*
-8.12%

PSIX

1D
-1.16%
1M
-25.82%
6M
-60.66%
YTD
-47.67%
1Y
-66.78%
3Y*
111.73%
5Y*
33.32%
10Y*
5.60%
ALL TIME*
4.04%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLSK vs. PSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLSK
CleanSpark, Inc.
42.49%9.88%-16.50%440.69%-78.57%-67.23%442.99%-73.90%-15.98%-30.29%
PSIX
Power Solutions International, Inc.
-47.67%92.07%1,351.22%-31.67%0.00%-9.09%-58.23%-14.59%23.33%0.00%

Correlation

The correlation between CLSK and PSIX is 0.38, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.23

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.19

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.12

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 29, 2016

0.12

Over the past year, CLSK and PSIX have become more correlated (0.38) than their long-term average of 0.12, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CLSK:

$3.70B

PSIX:

$689.21M

EPS

CLSK:

-$2.64

PSIX:

$4.43

PS Ratio

CLSK:

3.69

PSIX:

1.17

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLSK:

$739.88M

PSIX:

$586.96M

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLSK:

$306.93M

PSIX:

$172.81M

EBITDA (TTM)

CLSK:

-$103.41M

PSIX:

$102.78M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLSK vs. PSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLSK
CLSK Risk / Return Rank: 5252
Overall Rank
CLSK Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLSK Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLSK Omega Ratio Rank: 5353
Omega Ratio Rank
CLSK Calmar Ratio Rank: 5151
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLSK Martin Ratio Rank: 5050
Martin Ratio Rank

PSIX
PSIX Risk / Return Rank: 1212
Overall Rank
PSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1515
Sharpe Ratio Rank
PSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
PSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1717
Omega Ratio Rank
PSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 88
Calmar Ratio Rank
PSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 55
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLSK vs. PSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) and Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLSKPSIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.64

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.10

0.90

+0.20

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

-0.90

+1.10

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.32

-1.57

+1.89

CLSK vs. PSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLSK Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is higher than the PSIX Sharpe Ratio of -0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLSK and PSIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLSK vs. PSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLSK drawdown since its inception was -98.56%, roughly equal to the maximum PSIX drawdown of -98.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLSK and PSIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLSKPSIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-98.56%

-98.55%

-0.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-64.74%

-74.18%

+9.44%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-71.28%

-74.18%

+2.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-92.00%

-84.37%

-7.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-98.56%

-92.96%

-5.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-80.25%

-74.18%

-6.07%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-69.85%

-68.21%

-1.64%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

40.56%

42.58%

-2.02%

Volatility

CLSK vs. PSIX - Volatility Comparison

CleanSpark, Inc. (CLSK) has a higher volatility of 25.87% compared to Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX) at 15.50%. This indicates that CLSK's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLSKPSIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

25.87%

15.50%

+10.37%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

62.07%

87.79%

-25.72%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

89.16%

99.32%

-10.16%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

101.19%

112.73%

-11.54%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

183.42%

105.90%

+77.52%

Dividends

CLSK vs. PSIX - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLSK nor PSIX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CLSK vs. PSIX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between CleanSpark, Inc. and Power Solutions International, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0050.00M100.00M150.00M200.00MJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
136.41M
0
(CLSK) Total Revenue
(PSIX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


CLSK and PSIX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLSK has higher volatility (25.87%) compared to PSIX (15.50%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLSK dropped -98.56% vs PSIX's -98.55%.

CLSK currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.14 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLSK and PSIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer