PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLS vs. SMCI
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CLS vs. SMCI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLS achieves a 30.75% return, which is significantly lower than SMCI's 50.29% return. Over the past 10 years, CLS has outperformed SMCI with an annualized return of 43.16%, while SMCI has yielded a comparatively lower 32.81% annualized return.


CLS

1D
3.98%
1M
2.92%
YTD
30.75%
6M
13.42%
1Y
220.14%
3Y*
209.55%
5Y*
114.81%
10Y*
43.16%

SMCI

1D
5.64%
1M
24.37%
YTD
50.29%
6M
24.37%
1Y
5.87%
3Y*
18.91%
5Y*
64.69%
10Y*
32.81%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLS vs. SMCI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLS
Celestica Inc.
30.75%220.27%215.23%159.80%1.26%37.92%-2.42%-5.70%-16.32%-11.56%
SMCI
Super Micro Computer, Inc.
50.29%-3.97%7.23%246.24%86.80%38.82%31.81%74.06%-34.07%-25.38%

Correlation

The correlation between CLS and SMCI is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.48

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.47

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.42

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 29, 2007

0.38

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CLS:

$44.72B

SMCI:

$29.63B

EPS

CLS:

$8.28

SMCI:

$2.70

PE Ratio

CLS:

46.65

SMCI:

16.27

PEG Ratio

CLS:

0.63

SMCI:

0.36

PS Ratio

CLS:

3.24

SMCI:

0.86

PB Ratio

CLS:

21.31

SMCI:

3.91

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLS:

$13.81B

SMCI:

$33.70B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLS:

$1.60B

SMCI:

$2.83B

EBITDA (TTM)

CLS:

$1.32B

SMCI:

$1.47B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLS vs. SMCI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLS
CLS Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLS Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLS Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

SMCI
SMCI Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
SMCI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4545
Sharpe Ratio Rank
SMCI Sortino Ratio Rank: 4848
Sortino Ratio Rank
SMCI Omega Ratio Rank: 4949
Omega Ratio Rank
SMCI Calmar Ratio Rank: 4444
Calmar Ratio Rank
SMCI Martin Ratio Rank: 4444
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLS vs. SMCI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLSSMCIDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+2.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.26

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.09

+0.30

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.58

0.09

+7.49

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.88

0.15

+18.73

CLS vs. SMCI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLS Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is higher than the SMCI Sharpe Ratio of 0.07. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLS and SMCI, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLSSMCIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.06

0.07

+2.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.01

0.76

+1.24

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

0.47

+0.40

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

0.36

-0.09

Drawdowns

CLS vs. SMCI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLS drawdown since its inception was -96.93%, which is greater than SMCI's maximum drawdown of -84.84%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS and SMCI.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLSSMCIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.93%

-84.84%

-12.09%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.24%

-66.18%

+36.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.96%

-84.84%

+30.88%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.96%

-84.84%

+30.88%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.60%

-84.84%

+4.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.18%

-62.97%

+44.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.36%

-31.96%

-41.40%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.72%

38.91%

-27.19%

Volatility

CLS vs. SMCI - Volatility Comparison

Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Super Micro Computer, Inc. (SMCI) have volatilities of 26.60% and 26.36%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLSSMCIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.60%

26.36%

+0.24%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.08%

67.65%

-12.57%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.52%

79.63%

-7.11%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.62%

85.44%

-27.82%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.93%

70.55%

-20.62%

Dividends

CLS vs. SMCI - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLS nor SMCI has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CLS vs. SMCI - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celestica Inc. and Super Micro Computer, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.002.00B4.00B6.00B8.00B10.00B12.00B20222023202420252026
4.05B
10.24B
(CLS) Total Revenue
(SMCI) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CLS vs. SMCI - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Celestica Inc. and Super Micro Computer, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

6.0%8.0%10.0%12.0%14.0%16.0%18.0%20222023202420252026
10.8%
10.0%
Portfolio components
CLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.

SMCI - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Micro Computer, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.02B and revenue of 10.24B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.0%.

CLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.

SMCI - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Micro Computer, Inc. reported an operating income of 625.87M and revenue of 10.24B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.1%.

CLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.

SMCI - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Super Micro Computer, Inc. reported a net income of 1.02B and revenue of 10.24B, resulting in a net margin of 9.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CLS and SMCI have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

CLS has higher volatility (26.60%) compared to SMCI (26.36%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLS dropped -96.93% vs SMCI's -84.84%.

CLS currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.06 vs 0.07), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLS and SMCI

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer