CLS vs. PSIX

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX).

Performance

CLS vs. PSIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CLS vs. PSIX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
CLS Celestica Inc.	-4.71%	220.27%	215.23%	159.80%	1.26%	37.92%	-2.42%	-5.70%	-16.32%	-11.56%
PSIX Power Solutions International, Inc.	6.55%	92.07%	1,351.22%	-31.67%	0.00%	-9.09%	-58.23%	-14.59%	23.33%	0.00%

Fundamentals

EPS CLS : $7.19 PSIX : $7.41
PE Ratio CLS : 39.16 PSIX : 8.21
PEG Ratio CLS : 0.53 PSIX : 0.08
PS Ratio CLS : 2.63 PSIX : 1.76
Total Revenue (TTM) CLS : $12.41B PSIX : $531.18M
Gross Profit (TTM) CLS : $1.44B PSIX : $184.90M
EBITDA (TTM) CLS : $1.21B PSIX : $28.54M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLS achieves a -4.71% return, which is significantly lower than PSIX's 6.55% return. Over the past 10 years, CLS has outperformed PSIX with an annualized return of 38.34%, while PSIX has yielded a comparatively lower 16.67% annualized return.

CLS

• 1D: 9.49%
• 1M: 1.46%
• YTD: -4.71%
• 6M: 14.33%
• 1Y: 257.42%
• 3Y*: 179.50%
• 5Y*: 100.42%
• 10Y*: 38.34%

PSIX

• 1D: 8.50%
• 1M: -27.09%
• YTD: 6.55%
• 6M: -38.02%
• 1Y: 140.82%
• 3Y*: 187.95%
• 5Y*: 51.77%
• 10Y*: 16.67%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

CLS vs. PSIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLS

CLS Risk / Return Rank: 96
CLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
CLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 94
CLS Omega Ratio Rank: 93
CLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 98
CLS Martin Ratio Rank: 97

PSIX

PSIX Risk / Return Rank: 80
PSIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 85
PSIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 81
PSIX Omega Ratio Rank: 78
PSIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
PSIX Martin Ratio Rank: 76

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLS vs. PSIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLS	PSIX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	3.61	1.48	+2.13
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.28	2.12	+1.16
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.44	1.27	+0.17
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.23	2.38	+5.85
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	21.92	4.57	+17.35
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLS vs. PSIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLS Sharpe Ratio is 3.61, which is higher than the PSIX Sharpe Ratio of 1.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLS and PSIX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLS	PSIX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.61	1.48	+2.13
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	1.81	0.47	+1.35
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.79	0.16	+0.63
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.25	0.10	+0.15

Correlation

The correlation between CLS and PSIX is 0.13, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CLS vs. PSIX - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLS nor PSIX has paid dividends to shareholders.

Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

CLS vs. PSIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLS drawdown since its inception was -96.93%, roughly equal to the maximum PSIX drawdown of -98.55%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS and PSIX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLS	PSIX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.93%	-98.55%	+1.62%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-29.24%	-55.55%	+26.31%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.96%	-84.37%	+30.41%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-80.60%	-93.77%	+13.17%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-20.12%	-47.42%	+27.30%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-73.79%	-68.50%	-5.29%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.98%	29.00%	-18.02%

Volatility

CLS vs. PSIX - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Celestica Inc. (CLS) is 23.87%, while Power Solutions International, Inc. (PSIX) has a volatility of 43.80%. This indicates that CLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than PSIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLS	PSIX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	23.87%	43.80%	-19.93%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	54.95%	71.17%	-16.22%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	72.02%	95.99%	-23.97%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	55.73%	111.80%	-56.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	48.76%	104.83%	-56.07%

Financials