CLS vs. IBTH
CLS (Celestica Inc.) is a stock, while IBTH (iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF) is Government Bonds fund tracking the ICE 2027 Maturity US Treasury Index. Over the past 5 years, CLS returned 116.26%/yr vs 0.42%/yr for IBTH. At a correlation of -0.04, they often move in opposite directions.
Performance
CLS vs. IBTH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLS achieves a 32.99% return, which is significantly higher than IBTH's 1.03% return.
CLS
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- 9.64%
- YTD
- 32.99%
- 6M
- 28.26%
- 1Y
- 213.67%
- 3Y*
- 207.28%
- 5Y*
- 116.26%
- 10Y*
- 43.71%
IBTH
- 1D
- -0.02%
- 1M
- 0.23%
- YTD
- 1.03%
- 6M
- 1.29%
- 1Y
- 3.81%
- 3Y*
- 4.16%
- 5Y*
- 0.42%
- 10Y*
- —
CLS vs. IBTH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS Celestica Inc. | 32.99% | 220.27% | 215.23% | 159.80% | 1.26% | 37.92% | 22.27% |
IBTH iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF | 1.03% | 5.29% | 3.22% | 4.38% | -9.75% | -3.43% | 4.20% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLS and IBTH is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.09 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.02 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2020 | -0.04 |
The correlation between CLS and IBTH shifts across timeframes, from -0.04 (all time) to 0.09 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLS vs. IBTH — Risk / Return Rank
CLS
IBTH
CLS vs. IBTH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS) and iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF (IBTH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLS | IBTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.96 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -4.45 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.96 | -0.59 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.91 | 10.03 | -3.12 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.83 | 41.28 | -24.45 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLS vs. IBTH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLS drawdown since its inception was -96.93%, which is greater than IBTH's maximum drawdown of -16.16%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS and IBTH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLS | IBTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.93% | -16.16% | -80.77% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.24% | -0.38% | -28.86% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.96% | -2.09% | -51.87% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.96% | -14.41% | -39.55% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.78% | -1.25% | -15.53% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.31% | -6.69% | -66.62% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.98% | 0.09% | +11.89% |
Volatility
CLS vs. IBTH - Volatility Comparison
Celestica Inc. (CLS) has a higher volatility of 27.54% compared to iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF (IBTH) at 0.20%. This indicates that CLS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IBTH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLS | IBTH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.54% | 0.20% | +27.34% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.42% | 0.54% | +54.88% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.65% | 1.03% | +71.62% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.70% | 4.19% | +53.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.97% | 4.20% | +45.77% |
Dividends
CLS vs. IBTH - Dividend Comparison
CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while IBTH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.82%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS Celestica Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
IBTH iShares iBonds Dec 2027 Term Treasury ETF | 3.82% | 3.92% | 4.04% | 3.61% | 2.00% | 0.77% | 0.50% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLS and IBTH have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLS has higher volatility (27.54%) compared to IBTH (0.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLS dropped -96.93% vs IBTH's -16.16%.
IBTH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.74 vs 2.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLS and IBTH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer