CLS vs. HUT
CLS (Celestica Inc.) and HUT (Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock) are both stocks. CLS operates in Electronic Components (Technology), while HUT operates in Capital Markets (Financial Services). Over the past 5 years, CLS returned 116.26%/yr vs 42.31%/yr for HUT. At a 0.30 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CLS vs. HUT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLS achieves a 32.99% return, which is significantly lower than HUT's 158.73% return.
CLS
- 1D
- 1.88%
- 1M
- 9.64%
- YTD
- 32.99%
- 6M
- 28.26%
- 1Y
- 213.67%
- 3Y*
- 207.28%
- 5Y*
- 116.26%
- 10Y*
- 43.71%
HUT
- 1D
- 2.19%
- 1M
- 15.99%
- YTD
- 158.73%
- 6M
- 187.73%
- 1Y
- 579.98%
- 3Y*
- 124.18%
- 5Y*
- 42.31%
- 10Y*
- —
CLS vs. HUT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLS Celestica Inc. | 32.99% | 220.27% | 215.23% | 159.80% | 1.26% | 37.92% | -2.42% | -5.70% | -19.54% |
HUT Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock | 158.73% | 124.21% | 53.60% | 213.88% | -89.17% | 185.45% | 250.63% | -25.02% | -70.80% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLS and HUT is 0.46, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.46 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.39 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.40 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 8, 2018 | 0.30 |
The correlation between CLS and HUT shifts across timeframes, from 0.30 (all time) to 0.46 (1 year), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
CLS:
$45.48B
HUT:
$13.20B
CLS:
$8.28
HUT:
-$2.73
CLS:
21.68
HUT:
9.57
CLS:
$13.81B
HUT:
-$40.96M
CLS:
$1.60B
HUT:
-$132.19M
CLS:
$1.32B
HUT:
-$306.16M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLS vs. HUT — Risk / Return Rank
CLS
HUT
CLS vs. HUT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock (HUT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLS | HUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.57 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.04 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.48 | -0.11 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 6.91 | 14.30 | -7.39 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 16.83 | 38.93 | -22.10 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLS vs. HUT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLS drawdown since its inception was -96.93%, roughly equal to the maximum HUT drawdown of -95.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS and HUT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLS | HUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -96.93% | -95.04% | -1.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.24% | -38.62% | +9.38% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -53.96% | -71.68% | +17.72% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.96% | -95.04% | +41.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -80.60% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -16.78% | -10.65% | -6.13% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -73.31% | -63.55% | -9.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.98% | 14.16% | -2.18% |
Volatility
CLS vs. HUT - Volatility Comparison
Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock (HUT) have volatilities of 27.54% and 26.86%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLS | HUT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 27.54% | 26.86% | +0.68% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 55.42% | 76.73% | -21.31% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 72.65% | 103.29% | -30.64% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 57.70% | 105.62% | -47.92% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 49.97% | 114.75% | -64.78% |
Dividends
CLS vs. HUT - Dividend Comparison
Neither CLS nor HUT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
CLS vs. HUT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celestica Inc. and Hut 8 Corp. Common Stock. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
CLS and HUT have a correlation of 0.46, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
CLS has higher volatility (27.54%) compared to HUT (26.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLS dropped -96.93% vs HUT's -95.04%.
HUT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (5.35 vs 2.78), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLS and HUT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer