PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLS vs. DELL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CLS vs. DELL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Dell Technologies Inc. (DELL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLS achieves a 30.75% return, which is significantly lower than DELL's 220.76% return.


CLS

1D
3.98%
1M
2.92%
YTD
30.75%
6M
13.42%
1Y
220.14%
3Y*
209.55%
5Y*
114.81%
10Y*
43.16%

DELL

1D
1.62%
1M
53.87%
YTD
220.76%
6M
187.56%
1Y
257.68%
3Y*
107.08%
5Y*
52.91%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLS vs. DELL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
CLS
Celestica Inc.
30.75%220.27%215.23%159.80%1.26%37.92%-2.42%-5.70%0.80%
DELL
Dell Technologies Inc.
220.76%11.22%52.97%95.85%-26.63%51.21%42.62%5.16%15.88%

Correlation

The correlation between CLS and DELL is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.34

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.46

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.48

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 24, 2018

0.46

The correlation between CLS and DELL shifts across timeframes, from 0.34 (1 year) to 0.48 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CLS:

$44.72B

DELL:

$262.91B

EPS

CLS:

$8.28

DELL:

$12.42

PE Ratio

CLS:

46.65

DELL:

32.27

PEG Ratio

CLS:

0.63

DELL:

2.05

PS Ratio

CLS:

3.24

DELL:

2.02

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLS:

$13.81B

DELL:

$134.00B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLS:

$1.60B

DELL:

$25.67B

EBITDA (TTM)

CLS:

$1.32B

DELL:

$10.64B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLS vs. DELL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLS
CLS Risk / Return Rank: 9393
Overall Rank
CLS Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9595
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLS Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLS Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
CLS Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLS Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank

DELL
DELL Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
DELL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9898
Sharpe Ratio Rank
DELL Sortino Ratio Rank: 9797
Sortino Ratio Rank
DELL Omega Ratio Rank: 9595
Omega Ratio Rank
DELL Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
DELL Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLS vs. DELL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS) and Dell Technologies Inc. (DELL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLSDELLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.91

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.71

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.39

1.58

-0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

7.58

8.02

-0.44

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

18.88

18.09

+0.79

CLS vs. DELL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLS Sharpe Ratio is 3.06, which is comparable to the DELL Sharpe Ratio of 3.97. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLS and DELL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLSDELLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.06

3.97

-0.91

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

2.01

1.05

+0.96

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.87

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.27

1.05

-0.78

Drawdowns

CLS vs. DELL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLS drawdown since its inception was -96.93%, which is greater than DELL's maximum drawdown of -59.59%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS and DELL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLSDELLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.93%

-59.59%

-37.34%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.24%

-32.34%

+3.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-53.96%

-59.59%

+5.63%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-53.96%

-59.59%

+5.63%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-80.60%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-18.18%

-13.99%

-4.19%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-73.36%

-18.49%

-54.87%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.72%

14.32%

-2.60%

Volatility

CLS vs. DELL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Celestica Inc. (CLS) is 26.60%, while Dell Technologies Inc. (DELL) has a volatility of 37.86%. This indicates that CLS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than DELL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLSDELLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

26.60%

37.86%

-11.26%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.08%

54.13%

+0.95%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

72.52%

65.53%

+6.99%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.62%

50.75%

+6.87%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.93%

47.95%

+1.98%

Dividends

CLS vs. DELL - Dividend Comparison

CLS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while DELL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.55%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
CLS
Celestica Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
DELL
Dell Technologies Inc.
0.55%1.60%1.48%1.88%2.46%

Financials

CLS vs. DELL - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celestica Inc. and Dell Technologies Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.0010.00B20.00B30.00B40.00B20222023202420252026
4.05B
43.84B
(CLS) Total Revenue
(DELL) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CLS vs. DELL - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Celestica Inc. and Dell Technologies Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

-10.0%-5.0%0.0%5.0%10.0%15.0%20.0%25.0%20222023202420252026
10.8%
17.8%
Portfolio components
CLS - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.

DELL - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dell Technologies Inc. reported a gross profit of 7.78B and revenue of 43.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 17.8%.

CLS - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 272.10M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.7%.

DELL - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dell Technologies Inc. reported an operating income of 3.66B and revenue of 43.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.3%.

CLS - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.

DELL - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Dell Technologies Inc. reported a net income of 3.44B and revenue of 43.84B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CLS and DELL have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

DELL has higher volatility (37.86%) compared to CLS (26.60%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLS dropped -96.93% vs DELL's -59.59%.

DELL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.97 vs 3.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLS and DELL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer