PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLS.TO vs. IDXX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CLS.TO vs. IDXX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) and IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. (IDXX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CLS.TO is traded in CAD, while IDXX is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the IDXX values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLS.TO achieves a 5.93% return, which is significantly higher than IDXX's -17.21% return. Over the past 10 years, CLS.TO has outperformed IDXX with an annualized return of 40.06%, while IDXX has yielded a comparatively lower 20.00% annualized return.


CLS.TO

1D
-8.67%
1M
-16.62%
6M
3.50%
YTD
5.93%
1Y
92.16%
3Y*
170.29%
5Y*
115.61%
10Y*
40.06%
ALL TIME*
20.52%

IDXX

1D
0.97%
1M
-1.70%
6M
-19.80%
YTD
-17.21%
1Y
2.54%
3Y*
1.51%
5Y*
-2.52%
10Y*
20.00%
ALL TIME*
18.69%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$159.61MCA$161.91MCA$209.67M
CA$439.37MCA$523.03MCA$506.61M

CLS.TO vs. IDXX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLS.TO
Celestica Inc.
5.93%206.05%241.82%154.33%8.23%37.29%-4.64%-9.95%-9.26%-17.16%
IDXX
IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.
-17.21%56.16%-19.21%32.82%-34.12%31.66%86.88%34.59%28.96%24.32%

Correlation

The correlation between CLS.TO and IDXX is 0.12, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.21

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 23, 2006

0.23

The correlation between CLS.TO and IDXX shifts across timeframes, from 0.12 (1 year) to 0.25 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CLS.TO:

CA$49.45B

IDXX:

$42.94B

EPS

CLS.TO:

$8.29

IDXX:

$20.36

PE Ratio

CLS.TO:

36.89

IDXX:

26.73

PEG Ratio

CLS.TO:

0.50

IDXX:

2.31

PS Ratio

CLS.TO:

2.56

IDXX:

6.58

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLS.TO:

$13.81B

IDXX:

$4.45B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLS.TO:

$1.60B

IDXX:

$2.76B

EBITDA (TTM)

CLS.TO:

$1.36B

IDXX:

$1.52B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLS.TO vs. IDXX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLS.TO
CLS.TO Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
CLS.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLS.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 7878
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLS.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 7878
Omega Ratio Rank
CLS.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8585
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLS.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 8383
Martin Ratio Rank

IDXX
IDXX Risk / Return Rank: 4646
Overall Rank
IDXX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4646
Sharpe Ratio Rank
IDXX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4545
Sortino Ratio Rank
IDXX Omega Ratio Rank: 4444
Omega Ratio Rank
IDXX Calmar Ratio Rank: 4747
Calmar Ratio Rank
IDXX Martin Ratio Rank: 4646
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLS.TO vs. IDXX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) and IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. (IDXX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLS.TOIDXXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.19

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+1.33

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.06

+0.18

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.62

0.08

+2.54

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.99

0.13

+5.86

CLS.TO vs. IDXX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLS.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the IDXX Sharpe Ratio of 0.06. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLS.TO and IDXX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLS.TO vs. IDXX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLS.TO drawdown since its inception was -79.32%, which is greater than IDXX's maximum drawdown of -52.40%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLS.TO and IDXX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLS.TOIDXXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-79.32%

-52.40%

-26.92%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-35.38%

-33.06%

-2.32%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-54.25%

-34.35%

-19.90%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-54.25%

-52.40%

-1.85%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-79.32%

-52.40%

-26.92%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-34.12%

-29.09%

-5.03%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.95%

-12.44%

-16.51%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.44%

19.03%

-3.59%

Volatility

CLS.TO vs. IDXX - Volatility Comparison

Celestica Inc. (CLS.TO) has a higher volatility of 22.74% compared to IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. (IDXX) at 9.51%. This indicates that CLS.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than IDXX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLS.TOIDXXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.74%

9.51%

+13.23%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

55.70%

22.31%

+33.39%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

74.44%

42.70%

+31.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

57.51%

35.88%

+21.63%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

49.30%

33.68%

+15.62%

Dividends

CLS.TO vs. IDXX - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLS.TO nor IDXX has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CLS.TO vs. IDXX - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Celestica Inc. and IDEXX Laboratories, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B2.00B3.00B4.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
4.05B
1.14B
(CLS.TO) Total Revenue
(IDXX) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CLS.TO vs. IDXX - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Celestica Inc. and IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
10.8%
63.4%
Portfolio components
CLS.TO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a gross profit of 437.20M and revenue of 4.05B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 10.8%.

IDXX - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. reported a gross profit of 722.74M and revenue of 1.14B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 63.4%.

CLS.TO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Celestica Inc. reported an operating income of 267.70M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.6%.

IDXX - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. reported an operating income of 362.59M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in an operating margin of 31.8%.

CLS.TO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Celestica Inc. reported a net income of 212.30M and revenue of 4.05B, resulting in a net margin of 5.3%.

IDXX - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, IDEXX Laboratories, Inc. reported a net income of 278.45M and revenue of 1.14B, resulting in a net margin of 24.4%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CLS.TO and IDXX have a correlation of 0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLS.TO and IDXX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer