CLOU vs. ISCMF

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

CLOU (Global X Cloud Computing ETF) and ISCMF (iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLOU is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index, while ISCMF is a Commodities fund tracking the Bloomberg Commodity Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, CLOU returned 3.57%/yr vs 16.78%/yr for ISCMF. At a correlation of -0.03, they often move in opposite directions. CLOU charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ISCMF.

Performance

CLOU vs. ISCMF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOU achieves a -4.95% return, which is significantly lower than ISCMF's 22.87% return.

CLOU

• 1D: 0.42%
• 1M: -5.99%
• YTD: -4.95%
• 6M: -5.99%
• 1Y: -5.37%
• 3Y*: 3.57%
• 5Y*: -5.18%
• 10Y*: —

ISCMF

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: -4.99%
• YTD: 22.87%
• 6M: 22.87%
• 1Y: 31.30%
• 3Y*: 16.78%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOU vs. ISCMF - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF	-4.95%	-5.59%	5.74%	41.36%	-19.61%
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF	22.87%	19.65%	3.13%	-9.58%	-5.82%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOU and ISCMF is -0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.08
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.00
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 17, 2022	-0.03

Return for Risk

CLOU vs. ISCMF — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOU

CLOU Risk / Return Rank: 7
CLOU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7
CLOU Sortino Ratio Rank: 7
CLOU Omega Ratio Rank: 7
CLOU Calmar Ratio Rank: 7
CLOU Martin Ratio Rank: 7

ISCMF

ISCMF Risk / Return Rank: 78
ISCMF Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
ISCMF Sortino Ratio Rank: 77
ISCMF Omega Ratio Rank: 98
ISCMF Calmar Ratio Rank: 92
ISCMF Martin Ratio Rank: 69

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOU vs. ISCMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	CLOU	ISCMF	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	-0.18	1.76	-1.94
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	-0.05	3.18	-3.23
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.99	2.31	-1.32
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.20	5.53	-5.73
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	-0.47	11.85	-12.32

CLOU vs. ISCMF - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOU Sharpe Ratio is -0.18, which is lower than the ISCMF Sharpe Ratio of 1.76. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOU and ISCMF, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

CLOU vs. ISCMF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOU drawdown since its inception was -53.74%, which is greater than ISCMF's maximum drawdown of -25.42%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOU and ISCMF.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLOU	ISCMF	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.74%	-25.42%	-28.32%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.24%	-5.69%	-21.55%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.18%	-7.62%	-25.56%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.74%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-31.93%	-5.26%	-26.67%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.43%	-13.35%	-11.08%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.46%	2.65%	+8.81%

Volatility

CLOU vs. ISCMF - Volatility Comparison

Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) has a higher volatility of 13.72% compared to iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF (ISCMF) at 5.11%. This indicates that CLOU's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ISCMF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLOU	ISCMF	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.72%	5.11%	+8.61%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	25.33%	15.45%	+9.88%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.89%	17.84%	+12.05%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.65%	14.29%	+16.36%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.76%	14.29%	+16.47%

CLOU vs. ISCMF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOU has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is higher than ISCMF's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLOU vs. ISCMF - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLOU nor ISCMF has paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.76%	0.00%	0.05%
ISCMF iShares Diversified Commodity Swap UCITS ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLOU and ISCMF in my portfolio?

CLOU and ISCMF have a correlation of -0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLOU or ISCMF?

CLOU has higher volatility (13.72%) compared to ISCMF (5.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOU dropped -53.74% vs ISCMF's -25.42%.

Which ETF is better, CLOU or ISCMF?

On 3-year performance, ISCMF leads with 16.78% vs 3.57% for CLOU. On fees, ISCMF is cheaper at 0.19% per year. On volatility, ISCMF has been the lower-risk option at 5.11%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CLOU or ISCMF?

Over the 3-year period, ISCMF has performed better with a 16.78% return vs 3.57%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLOU or ISCMF?

ISCMF is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for CLOU.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLOU or ISCMF?

CLOU and ISCMF have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.

What is the main difference between CLOU and ISCMF?

CLOU is categorized as Technology Equities, while ISCMF is Commodities. CLOU tracks Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index, while ISCMF tracks Bloomberg Commodity Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.68% for CLOU and 0.19% for ISCMF.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

ISCMF currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.76 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.