CLOU vs. FKRCX
CLOU (Global X Cloud Computing ETF) and FKRCX (Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund) are both funds - CLOU is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index, while FKRCX is a Gold fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 5 years, CLOU returned -5.18%/yr vs 21.73%/yr for FKRCX. At a 0.26 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLOU charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for FKRCX.
Performance
CLOU vs. FKRCX - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLOU achieves a -4.95% return, which is significantly lower than FKRCX's -1.84% return.
CLOU
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- -5.99%
- YTD
- -4.95%
- 6M
- -5.99%
- 1Y
- -5.37%
- 3Y*
- 3.57%
- 5Y*
- -5.18%
- 10Y*
- —
FKRCX
- 1D
- -1.37%
- 1M
- -4.21%
- YTD
- -1.84%
- 6M
- -5.57%
- 1Y
- 74.96%
- 3Y*
- 52.41%
- 5Y*
- 21.73%
- 10Y*
- 14.12%
CLOU vs. FKRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF | -4.95% | -5.59% | 5.74% | 41.36% | -39.56% | -3.27% | 77.18% | 4.06% |
FKRCX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund | -1.84% | 196.59% | 17.64% | 2.03% | -23.47% | -4.03% | 44.30% | 41.45% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLOU and FKRCX is 0.17, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.17 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.23 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.27 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 16, 2019 | 0.26 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLOU vs. FKRCX — Risk / Return Rank
CLOU
FKRCX
CLOU vs. FKRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLOU | FKRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.92 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.29 | -0.30 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.20 | 2.21 | -2.40 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.47 | 6.07 | -6.54 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLOU vs. FKRCX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLOU drawdown since its inception was -53.74%, smaller than the maximum FKRCX drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOU and FKRCX.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLOU | FKRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -53.74% | -78.85% | +25.11% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.24% | -34.78% | +7.54% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -33.18% | -34.78% | +1.60% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -53.74% | -48.79% | -4.95% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -49.54% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -31.93% | -27.05% | -4.88% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -24.43% | -33.73% | +9.30% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 11.46% | 12.61% | -1.15% |
Volatility
CLOU vs. FKRCX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) is 13.72%, while Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) has a volatility of 16.59%. This indicates that CLOU experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FKRCX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLOU | FKRCX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 13.72% | 16.59% | -2.87% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 25.33% | 37.75% | -12.42% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 29.89% | 44.23% | -14.34% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 30.65% | 34.31% | -3.66% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 30.76% | 33.13% | -2.37% |
CLOU vs. FKRCX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLOU has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than FKRCX's 0.88% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLOU vs. FKRCX - Dividend Comparison
CLOU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FKRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.95%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.76% | 0.00% | 0.05% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
FKRCX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund | 10.95% | 10.75% | 13.44% | 3.12% | 0.00% | 9.37% | 10.55% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 8.73% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLOU and FKRCX have a correlation of 0.17, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FKRCX has higher volatility (16.59%) compared to CLOU (13.72%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOU dropped -53.74% vs FKRCX's -78.85%.
FKRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.74 vs -0.18), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for CLOU and FKRCX
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer