CLOU vs. FKRCX

Last updated Jun 3, 2026

CLOU (Global X Cloud Computing ETF) and FKRCX (Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund) are both funds - CLOU is a Technology Equities fund tracking the Indxx Global Cloud Computing Index, while FKRCX is a Precious Metals fund managed by Franklin Templeton. Over the past 5 years, CLOU returned 0.30%/yr vs 20.72%/yr for FKRCX. At a 0.25 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLOU charges 0.68%/yr vs 0.88%/yr for FKRCX.

Performance

CLOU vs. FKRCX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLOU achieves a 13.35% return, which is significantly higher than FKRCX's 5.59% return.

CLOU

• 1D: -2.81%
• 1M: 21.81%
• YTD: 13.35%
• 6M: 13.05%
• 1Y: 11.58%
• 3Y*: 10.56%
• 5Y*: 0.30%
• 10Y*: —

FKRCX

• 1D: -2.44%
• 1M: -0.55%
• YTD: 5.59%
• 6M: 17.92%
• 1Y: 85.11%
• 3Y*: 53.21%
• 5Y*: 20.72%
• 10Y*: 15.83%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOU vs. FKRCX - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF	13.35%	-5.59%	5.74%	41.36%	-39.56%	-3.27%	77.18%	4.79%
FKRCX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund	5.59%	196.59%	17.64%	2.03%	-23.47%	-4.03%	44.30%	43.86%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOU and FKRCX is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.14
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.22
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.27
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 17, 2019	0.25

The correlation between CLOU and FKRCX shifts across timeframes, from 0.14 (1 year) to 0.27 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Return for Risk

CLOU vs. FKRCX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOU

CLOU Risk / Return Rank: 15
CLOU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
CLOU Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
CLOU Omega Ratio Rank: 16
CLOU Calmar Ratio Rank: 14
CLOU Martin Ratio Rank: 13

FKRCX

FKRCX Risk / Return Rank: 47
FKRCX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
FKRCX Sortino Ratio Rank: 35
FKRCX Omega Ratio Rank: 43
FKRCX Calmar Ratio Rank: 63
FKRCX Martin Ratio Rank: 40

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOU vs. FKRCX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLOU	FKRCX	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	0.40	2.21	-1.81
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.75	2.50	-1.75
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.09	1.35	-0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.44	3.07	-2.64
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	1.09	8.71	-7.63
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLOU vs. FKRCX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLOU Sharpe Ratio is 0.40, which is lower than the FKRCX Sharpe Ratio of 2.21. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLOU and FKRCX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLOU	FKRCX	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.40	2.21	-1.81
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.01	0.62	-0.61
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.48	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.26	0.19	+0.07

Drawdowns

CLOU vs. FKRCX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOU drawdown since its inception was -53.74%, smaller than the maximum FKRCX drawdown of -78.85%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOU and FKRCX.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLOU	FKRCX	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-53.74%	-78.85%	+25.11%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-27.24%	-31.15%	+3.91%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-33.18%	-31.15%	-2.03%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-53.74%	-48.79%	-4.95%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-49.54%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-18.82%	-21.52%	+2.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-24.42%	-33.74%	+9.32%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	11.01%	10.99%	+0.02%

Volatility

CLOU vs. FKRCX - Volatility Comparison

Global X Cloud Computing ETF (CLOU) and Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund (FKRCX) have volatilities of 13.10% and 13.56%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLOU	FKRCX	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	13.10%	13.56%	-0.46%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	24.52%	35.27%	-10.75%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	29.26%	42.29%	-13.03%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	30.53%	33.82%	-3.29%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	30.77%	32.95%	-2.18%

CLOU vs. FKRCX - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOU has a 0.68% expense ratio, which is lower than FKRCX's 0.88% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLOU vs. FKRCX - Dividend Comparison

CLOU has not paid dividends to shareholders, while FKRCX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.18%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016
CLOU Global X Cloud Computing ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.76%	0.00%	0.05%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
FKRCX Franklin Gold and Precious Metals Fund	10.18%	10.75%	13.44%	3.12%	0.00%	9.37%	10.55%	0.00%	0.00%	0.37%	8.73%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLOU and FKRCX in my portfolio?

CLOU and FKRCX have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLOU or FKRCX?

FKRCX has higher volatility (13.56%) compared to CLOU (13.10%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLOU dropped -53.74% vs FKRCX's -78.85%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

FKRCX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.21 vs 0.40), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.