CLOD vs. ARMH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CLOD (Themes Cloud Computing ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. CLOD is passively managed, while ARMH is actively managed. Their correlation of 0.80 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CLOD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.

Performance

CLOD vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CLOD

• 1D: -3.72%
• 1M: 14.95%
• YTD: 3.48%
• 6M: 1.34%
• 1Y: 2.49%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ARMH

• 1D: 2.87%
• 1M: —
• YTD: —
• 6M: —
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLOD vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)
CLOD Themes Cloud Computing ETF	4.52%
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	23.00%

Correlation

The correlation between CLOD and ARMH is 0.80, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 29, 2026	0.80

Return for Risk

CLOD vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOD

CLOD Risk / Return Rank: 10
CLOD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
CLOD Sortino Ratio Rank: 10
CLOD Omega Ratio Rank: 10
CLOD Calmar Ratio Rank: 10
CLOD Martin Ratio Rank: 10

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLOD vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLOD	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.10	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.31	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.04	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.08	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.17	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLOD	ARMH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.10	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.54	471,500.14	-471,499.60

Drawdowns

CLOD vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOD drawdown since its inception was -31.36%, which is greater than ARMH's maximum drawdown of -1.61%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOD and ARMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLOD	ARMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-31.36%	-1.61%	-29.75%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-31.36%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-6.61%	0.00%	-6.61%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.51%	-0.40%	-7.11%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	14.29%	—	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLOD	ARMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	10.13%	—	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	21.71%	—	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	25.07%	113.00%	-87.93%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	24.46%	113.00%	-88.54%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	24.46%	113.00%	-88.54%

CLOD vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLOD vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison

CLOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.42%, while ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF	0.00%	0.00%
CLOD Themes Cloud Computing ETF	1.42%	1.47%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLOD and ARMH in my portfolio?

CLOD and ARMH have a correlation of 0.80, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLOD or ARMH?

On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLOD or ARMH?

ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CLOD.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLOD or ARMH?

CLOD has the higher dividend yield at 1.42%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.

What is the main difference between CLOD and ARMH?

They also come from different issuers: Themes and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CLOD and 0.19% for ARMH.