CLOD vs. ARMH
CLOD (Themes Cloud Computing ETF) and ARMH (Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. CLOD is passively managed, while ARMH is actively managed. At a 0.35 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLOD charges 0.35%/yr vs 0.19%/yr for ARMH.
Performance
CLOD vs. ARMH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLOD
- 1D
- -0.83%
- 1M
- 1.98%
- 6M
- 1.25%
- YTD
- -2.62%
- 1Y
- -6.02%
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARMH
- 1D
- -5.46%
- 1M
- -33.82%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
CLOD vs. ARMH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLOD Themes Cloud Computing ETF | 1.36% |
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | -16.00% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLOD and ARMH is 0.35, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.35 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLOD vs. ARMH — Risk / Return Rank
CLOD
ARMH
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
CLOD vs. ARMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) and Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF (ARMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLOD | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.98 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.19 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.40 | — | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLOD vs. ARMH - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLOD drawdown since its inception was -31.36%, smaller than the maximum ARMH drawdown of -41.19%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOD and ARMH.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLOD | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -31.36% | -41.19% | +9.83% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -31.36% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -12.12% | -41.19% | +29.07% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -7.76% | -17.23% | +9.47% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 15.02% | — | — |
Volatility
CLOD vs. ARMH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLOD | ARMH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.80% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 22.65% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.97% | 103.28% | -77.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.50% | 103.28% | -78.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.50% | 103.28% | -78.78% |
CLOD vs. ARMH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLOD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than ARMH's 0.19% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLOD vs. ARMH - Dividend Comparison
CLOD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.51%, while ARMH has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 |
|---|---|---|
ARMH Arm Holdings PLC ADRhedged ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% |
CLOD Themes Cloud Computing ETF | 1.51% | 1.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLOD and ARMH have a correlation of 0.35, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, ARMH is cheaper at 0.19% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
ARMH is cheaper with a 0.19% expense ratio, compared with 0.35% for CLOD.
CLOD has the higher dividend yield at 1.51%, compared with 0.00% for ARMH.
They also come from different issuers: Themes and Precidian. Their fees differ too: 0.35% for CLOD and 0.19% for ARMH.
Find the right allocation for CLOD and ARMH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer