CLOD vs. XLF
Compare and contrast key facts about Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF).
CLOD and XLF are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. CLOD is a passively managed fund by Themes that tracks the performance of the Solactive Cloud Technology Index. It was launched on Dec 14, 2023. XLF is a passively managed fund by State Street that tracks the performance of the Financial Select Sector Index. It was launched on Dec 16, 1998. Both CLOD and XLF are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: CLOD or XLF.
Correlation
The correlation between CLOD and XLF is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
CLOD vs. XLF - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
CLOD:
1.00
XLF:
2.19
CLOD:
1.41
XLF:
3.13
CLOD:
1.18
XLF:
1.40
CLOD:
1.58
XLF:
4.26
CLOD:
4.90
XLF:
12.61
CLOD:
4.18%
XLF:
2.51%
CLOD:
20.52%
XLF:
14.53%
CLOD:
-12.99%
XLF:
-82.43%
CLOD:
-2.74%
XLF:
-1.53%
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLOD achieves a 7.02% return, which is significantly higher than XLF's 6.33% return.
CLOD
7.02%
2.81%
21.65%
25.03%
N/A
N/A
XLF
6.33%
1.46%
17.59%
31.68%
13.04%
14.62%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CLOD vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLOD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.13% expense ratio.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
CLOD vs. XLF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
CLOD
XLF
CLOD vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
CLOD vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison
CLOD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.34%.
| TTM | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLOD Themes Cloud Computing ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
XLF Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund | 1.34% | 1.42% | 1.71% | 2.04% | 1.63% | 2.03% | 1.86% | 2.09% | 1.48% | 1.63% | 2.40% | 1.98% |
Drawdowns
CLOD vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLOD drawdown since its inception was -12.99%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOD and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
CLOD vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison
Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) has a higher volatility of 5.24% compared to Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF) at 3.16%. This indicates that CLOD's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XLF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.