PortfoliosLab logo
CLOD vs. XLF
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between CLOD and XLF is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Performance

CLOD vs. XLF - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading data...

Key characteristics

Daily Std Dev

CLOD:

14.42%

XLF:

20.23%

Max Drawdown

CLOD:

-0.55%

XLF:

-82.43%

Current Drawdown

CLOD:

-0.55%

XLF:

-4.12%

Returns By Period


CLOD

YTD

N/A

1M

N/A

6M

N/A

1Y

N/A

5Y*

N/A

10Y*

N/A

XLF

YTD

3.54%

1M

6.84%

6M

2.16%

1Y

21.05%

5Y*

20.88%

10Y*

14.08%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CLOD vs. XLF - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLOD has a 0.35% expense ratio, which is higher than XLF's 0.13% expense ratio.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLOD vs. XLF — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLOD
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of CLOD is 7575
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of CLOD is 7575
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of CLOD is 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of CLOD is 7373
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of CLOD is 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of CLOD is 7272
Martin Ratio Rank

XLF
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of XLF is 8787
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of XLF is 8585
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of XLF is 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of XLF is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of XLF is 9191
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of XLF is 8787
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

CLOD vs. XLF - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Themes Cloud Computing ETF (CLOD) and Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund (XLF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.



Loading data...

Dividends

CLOD vs. XLF - Dividend Comparison

CLOD has not paid dividends to shareholders, while XLF's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.43%.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CLOD
Themes Cloud Computing ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
XLF
Financial Select Sector SPDR Fund
1.43%1.42%1.71%2.04%1.63%2.03%1.86%2.09%1.48%1.63%2.40%1.98%

Drawdowns

CLOD vs. XLF - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLOD drawdown since its inception was -0.55%, smaller than the maximum XLF drawdown of -82.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLOD and XLF. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


Loading data...

Volatility

CLOD vs. XLF - Volatility Comparison


Loading data...