CLML.TO vs. ICLN

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

CLML.TO (CI Global Climate Leaders Fund) and ICLN (iShares Global Clean Energy ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - CLML.TO is a fund fund, while ICLN is a Alternative Energy Equities fund tracking the S&P Global Clean Energy Index. Over the past 3 years, CLML.TO returned 43.47%/yr vs 10.31%/yr for ICLN. At a 0.28 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

CLML.TO vs. ICLN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Global Climate Leaders Fund (CLML.TO) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Different Trading Currencies

CLML.TO is traded in CAD, while ICLN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ICLN values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLML.TO achieves a 35.72% return, which is significantly lower than ICLN's 42.53% return.

CLML.TO

• 1D: -0.60%
• 1M: 3.68%
• YTD: 35.72%
• 6M: 32.06%
• 1Y: 58.24%
• 3Y*: 43.47%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

ICLN

• 1D: 0.14%
• 1M: 10.82%
• YTD: 42.53%
• 6M: 36.71%
• 1Y: 86.78%
• 3Y*: 10.31%
• 5Y*: 5.05%
• 10Y*: 12.71%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLML.TO vs. ICLN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CLML.TO CI Global Climate Leaders Fund	35.72%	25.21%	63.19%	12.83%	-18.69%	9.27%
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF	42.53%	40.30%	-19.33%	-22.16%	1.31%	-7.33%

Correlation

The correlation between CLML.TO and ICLN is 0.52, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.52
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.33
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021	0.28

Over the past year, CLML.TO and ICLN have become more correlated (0.52) than their long-term average of 0.28, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Return for Risk

CLML.TO vs. ICLN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLML.TO

CLML.TO Risk / Return Rank: 89
CLML.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 87
CLML.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 87
CLML.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 82
CLML.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 95
CLML.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 93

ICLN

ICLN Risk / Return Rank: 89
ICLN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
ICLN Sortino Ratio Rank: 86
ICLN Omega Ratio Rank: 81
ICLN Calmar Ratio Rank: 94
ICLN Martin Ratio Rank: 91

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLML.TO vs. ICLN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Climate Leaders Fund (CLML.TO) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLML.TO	ICLN	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.88	3.42	-0.55
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	3.92	4.14	-0.21
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.48	1.51	-0.03
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	8.02	6.74	+1.29
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	24.19	20.00	+4.19
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLML.TO vs. ICLN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLML.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.88, which is comparable to the ICLN Sharpe Ratio of 3.42. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLML.TO and ICLN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLML.TO	ICLN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.88	3.42	-0.55
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.20	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.51	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.13	0.14	+0.99

Drawdowns

CLML.TO vs. ICLN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLML.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.17%, smaller than the maximum ICLN drawdown of -74.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLML.TO and ICLN.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLML.TO	ICLN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.17%	-74.66%	+46.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.30%	-12.95%	+5.65%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-25.94%	-38.60%	+12.66%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-50.59%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-62.62%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.60%	-18.79%	+18.19%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-8.95%	-42.36%	+33.41%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.42%	4.35%	-1.93%

Volatility

CLML.TO vs. ICLN - Volatility Comparison

CI Global Climate Leaders Fund (CLML.TO) and iShares Global Clean Energy ETF (ICLN) have volatilities of 8.69% and 9.02%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLML.TO	ICLN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.69%	9.02%	-0.33%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	16.51%	19.82%	-3.31%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.36%	25.51%	-5.15%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.68%	25.06%	-4.38%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.68%	25.07%	-4.39%

Dividends

CLML.TO vs. ICLN - Dividend Comparison

CLML.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ICLN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.16%.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLML.TO CI Global Climate Leaders Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
ICLN iShares Global Clean Energy ETF	1.16%	1.63%	1.85%	1.59%	0.89%	1.18%	0.34%	1.36%	2.77%	2.49%	3.88%	2.36%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLML.TO and ICLN in my portfolio?

CLML.TO and ICLN have a correlation of 0.52, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.