CLML.TO vs. ARCC
CLML.TO (CI Global Climate Leaders Fund) is fund fund, while ARCC (Ares Capital Corporation) is a stock. Over the past 3 years, CLML.TO returned 44.11%/yr vs 10.34%/yr for ARCC. At a 0.15 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
CLML.TO vs. ARCC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
CLML.TO is traded in CAD, while ARCC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the ARCC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLML.TO achieves a 36.54% return, which is significantly higher than ARCC's -3.93% return.
CLML.TO
- 1D
- 0.37%
- 1M
- 6.60%
- YTD
- 36.54%
- 6M
- 35.01%
- 1Y
- 58.40%
- 3Y*
- 44.11%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
ARCC
- 1D
- -1.12%
- 1M
- -0.66%
- YTD
- -3.93%
- 6M
- -6.02%
- 1Y
- -5.37%
- 3Y*
- 10.34%
- 5Y*
- 11.74%
- 10Y*
- 13.38%
CLML.TO vs. ARCC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLML.TO CI Global Climate Leaders Fund | 36.54% | 25.21% | 63.19% | 12.83% | -18.69% | 9.27% |
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | -3.93% | -3.57% | 30.07% | 17.39% | 3.01% | 11.55% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLML.TO and ARCC is 0.18, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.18 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 14, 2021 | 0.15 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLML.TO vs. ARCC — Risk / Return Rank
CLML.TO
ARCC
CLML.TO vs. ARCC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Climate Leaders Fund (CLML.TO) and Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLML.TO | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +3.18 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +4.22 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.49 | 0.97 | +0.52 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 8.04 | -0.28 | +8.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 24.25 | -0.53 | +24.78 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLML.TO | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.88 | -0.29 | +3.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.63 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | 0.55 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.14 | 0.73 | +0.40 |
Drawdowns
CLML.TO vs. ARCC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLML.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.17%, smaller than the maximum ARCC drawdown of -52.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLML.TO and ARCC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLML.TO | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -28.17% | -52.90% | +24.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -7.30% | -19.37% | +12.07% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -25.94% | -21.60% | -4.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -21.60% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -52.90% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -15.16% | +15.16% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.96% | -5.22% | -3.74% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.42% | 10.22% | -7.80% |
Volatility
CLML.TO vs. ARCC - Volatility Comparison
CI Global Climate Leaders Fund (CLML.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.88% compared to Ares Capital Corporation (ARCC) at 3.61%. This indicates that CLML.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ARCC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLML.TO | ARCC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.88% | 3.61% | +5.27% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.50% | 14.70% | +1.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 20.38% | 18.40% | +1.98% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.68% | 18.67% | +2.01% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 20.68% | 24.27% | -3.59% |
Dividends
CLML.TO vs. ARCC - Dividend Comparison
CLML.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ARCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ARCC Ares Capital Corporation | 10.28% | 9.49% | 8.77% | 9.59% | 10.12% | 7.65% | 9.47% | 9.01% | 9.88% | 9.67% | 9.22% | 11.02% |
CLML.TO CI Global Climate Leaders Fund | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLML.TO and ARCC have a correlation of 0.18, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
Find the right allocation for CLML.TO and ARCC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer