PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLML.TO vs. OXLC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLML.TO vs. OXLC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Global Climate Leaders Fund (CLML.TO) and Oxford Lane Capital Corp. (OXLC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

CLML.TO is traded in CAD, while OXLC is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the OXLC values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLML.TO achieves a 25.72% return, which is significantly higher than OXLC's -7.01% return.


CLML.TO

1D
-0.97%
1M
-7.84%
6M
20.44%
YTD
25.72%
1Y
33.44%
3Y*
37.82%
5Y*
20.73%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
20.69%

OXLC

1D
-1.57%
1M
2.15%
6M
-10.52%
YTD
-7.01%
1Y
-10.15%
3Y*
-3.28%
5Y*
-1.41%
10Y*
5.81%
ALL TIME*
6.24%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
CA$494.12KCA$394.47KCA$468.54K
CA$11.97MCA$10.61MCA$13.37M

CLML.TO vs. OXLC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CLML.TO
CI Global Climate Leaders Fund
25.72%25.21%63.19%12.83%-18.69%9.27%
OXLC
Oxford Lane Capital Corp.
-7.01%-27.83%35.13%13.75%-19.34%10.08%

Correlation

The correlation between CLML.TO and OXLC is 0.09, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.09

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.08

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.06

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 13, 2021

0.06

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLML.TO vs. OXLC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLML.TO
CLML.TO Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
CLML.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6363
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLML.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLML.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
CLML.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLML.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 7676
Martin Ratio Rank

OXLC
OXLC Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
OXLC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3333
Sharpe Ratio Rank
OXLC Sortino Ratio Rank: 3131
Sortino Ratio Rank
OXLC Omega Ratio Rank: 3131
Omega Ratio Rank
OXLC Calmar Ratio Rank: 3838
Calmar Ratio Rank
OXLC Martin Ratio Rank: 3737
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLML.TO vs. OXLC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Climate Leaders Fund (CLML.TO) and Oxford Lane Capital Corp. (OXLC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLML.TOOXLCDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.68

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.12

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.99

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.90

-0.21

+3.11

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

9.65

-0.41

+10.06

CLML.TO vs. OXLC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLML.TO Sharpe Ratio is 1.45, which is higher than the OXLC Sharpe Ratio of -0.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLML.TO and OXLC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLML.TO vs. OXLC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLML.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.17%, smaller than the maximum OXLC drawdown of -72.62%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLML.TO and OXLC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLML.TOOXLCDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-28.17%

-72.62%

+44.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.58%

-48.55%

+36.97%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.94%

-59.01%

+33.07%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-28.17%

-59.01%

+30.84%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-72.62%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-10.72%

-35.96%

+25.24%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-8.85%

-13.37%

+4.52%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.47%

24.64%

-21.17%

Volatility

CLML.TO vs. OXLC - Volatility Comparison

CI Global Climate Leaders Fund (CLML.TO) has a higher volatility of 8.33% compared to Oxford Lane Capital Corp. (OXLC) at 5.36%. This indicates that CLML.TO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than OXLC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLML.TOOXLCDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

8.33%

5.36%

+2.97%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

19.08%

37.24%

-18.16%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.21%

43.51%

-20.30%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

21.14%

29.25%

-8.11%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

21.08%

43.77%

-22.69%

Dividends

CLML.TO vs. OXLC - Dividend Comparison

CLML.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while OXLC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 72.04%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
CLML.TO
CI Global Climate Leaders Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
OXLC
Oxford Lane Capital Corp.
72.04%35.86%20.12%18.83%17.75%10.51%22.46%19.85%16.70%17.91%22.84%24.10%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLML.TO and OXLC have a correlation of 0.09, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLML.TO and OXLC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer