CLML.TO vs. EBNK.TO

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about CI Global Climate Leaders Fund (CLML.TO) and Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO).

CLML.TO and EBNK.TO are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. EBNK.TO is an actively managed fund by Evolve. It was launched on Jan 7, 2022.

Performance

CLML.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in CI Global Climate Leaders Fund (CLML.TO) and Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

CLML.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
CLML.TO CI Global Climate Leaders Fund	12.21%	25.21%	63.19%	12.83%	-11.67%
EBNK.TO Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD	-4.60%	60.13%	28.78%	20.83%	-4.75%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLML.TO achieves a 12.21% return, which is significantly higher than EBNK.TO's -4.60% return.

CLML.TO

• 1D: 2.44%
• 1M: -3.32%
• YTD: 12.21%
• 6M: 15.38%
• 1Y: 50.15%
• 3Y*: 35.18%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

EBNK.TO

• 1D: 1.86%
• 1M: -7.58%
• YTD: -4.60%
• 6M: 6.07%
• 1Y: 26.42%
• 3Y*: 32.26%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLML.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Expense Ratio Comparison

EBNK.TO

Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD

Return for Risk

CLML.TO vs. EBNK.TO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLML.TO

CLML.TO Risk / Return Rank: 94
CLML.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 91
CLML.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 95
CLML.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 92
CLML.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 96
CLML.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 96

EBNK.TO

EBNK.TO Risk / Return Rank: 58
EBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 52
EBNK.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 57
EBNK.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 56
EBNK.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 60
EBNK.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 63

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLML.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for CI Global Climate Leaders Fund (CLML.TO) and Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLML.TO	EBNK.TO	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	2.04	0.92	+1.13
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	3.02	1.46	+1.57
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.40	1.20	+0.20
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	4.21	1.50	+2.71
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	17.78	6.16	+11.62
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

CLML.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLML.TO Sharpe Ratio is 2.04, which is higher than the EBNK.TO Sharpe Ratio of 0.92. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLML.TO and EBNK.TO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLML.TO	EBNK.TO	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.04	0.92	+1.13
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.95	0.79	+0.16

Correlation

The correlation between CLML.TO and EBNK.TO is 0.27, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

CLML.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Dividend Comparison

CLML.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while EBNK.TO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.81%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022
CLML.TO CI Global Climate Leaders Fund	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
EBNK.TO Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD	10.81%	11.05%	12.56%	7.32%	7.52%

Drawdowns

CLML.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLML.TO drawdown since its inception was -28.17%, smaller than the maximum EBNK.TO drawdown of -31.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLML.TO and EBNK.TO.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLML.TO	EBNK.TO	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-28.17%	-31.02%	+2.85%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-11.79%	-17.39%	+5.60%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-4.51%	-11.20%	+6.69%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-9.24%	-7.56%	-1.68%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.79%	4.24%	-1.45%

Volatility

CLML.TO vs. EBNK.TO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for CI Global Climate Leaders Fund (CLML.TO) is 7.13%, while Evolve European Banks Enhanced Yield ETF Hedged CAD (EBNK.TO) has a volatility of 9.36%. This indicates that CLML.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than EBNK.TO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLML.TO	EBNK.TO	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	7.13%	9.36%	-2.23%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.03%	14.91%	+0.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	24.66%	28.95%	-4.29%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.43%	27.02%	-6.59%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	20.43%	27.02%	-6.59%