PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLIX vs. USL
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLIX vs. USL - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLIX achieves a -4.99% return, which is significantly lower than USL's 60.58% return.


CLIX

1D
1.29%
1M
-4.75%
YTD
-4.99%
6M
-4.57%
1Y
12.25%
3Y*
19.14%
5Y*
-6.16%
10Y*

USL

1D
-1.53%
1M
-1.98%
YTD
60.58%
6M
56.11%
1Y
56.55%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
17.05%
10Y*
10.57%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLIX vs. USL - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLIX
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
-4.99%32.81%20.73%28.97%-46.73%-39.96%90.91%17.32%6.34%-2.09%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
60.58%-12.37%8.30%-1.11%27.10%62.48%-25.23%28.01%-14.15%7.67%

Correlation

The correlation between CLIX and USL is -0.22, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.22

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.05

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 17, 2017

0.09

The correlation between CLIX and USL shifts across timeframes, from -0.22 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CLIX vs. USL - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CLIX
USL

Consumer Cyclical

94.8%

-

Technology

3.6%

-

Consumer Defensive

1.6%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Communication Services

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

4.5%

Healthcare

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

CLIX
94.8%
USL

-

Technology

CLIX
3.6%
USL

-

Consumer Defensive

CLIX
1.6%
USL

-

Basic Materials

CLIX

-

USL

-

Communication Services

CLIX

-

USL

-

Energy

CLIX

-

USL

-

Financial Services

CLIX

-

USL
4.5%

Healthcare

CLIX

-

USL

-

Industrials

CLIX

-

USL

-

Real Estate

CLIX

-

USL

-

Utilities

CLIX

-

USL

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLIX vs. USL — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLIX
CLIX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
CLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1919
Omega Ratio Rank
CLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1717
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

USL
USL Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
USL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6060
Sharpe Ratio Rank
USL Sortino Ratio Rank: 5353
Sortino Ratio Rank
USL Omega Ratio Rank: 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
USL Calmar Ratio Rank: 6969
Calmar Ratio Rank
USL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLIX vs. USL - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) and United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLIXUSLDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.40

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.60

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.11

1.33

-0.22

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.63

3.39

-2.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

1.71

6.85

-5.14

CLIX vs. USL - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.59, which is lower than the USL Sharpe Ratio of 1.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLIX and USL, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLIXUSLDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.59

1.99

-1.40

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.23

0.57

-0.80

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.18

0.01

+0.17

Drawdowns

CLIX vs. USL - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLIX drawdown since its inception was -73.21%, smaller than the maximum USL drawdown of -89.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLIX and USL.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLIXUSLDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.21%

-89.06%

+15.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.57%

-16.76%

-2.81%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.18%

-23.33%

+2.15%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.22%

-33.82%

-34.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-66.02%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-43.88%

-39.10%

-4.78%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.71%

-61.45%

+26.74%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

7.17%

8.27%

-1.10%

Volatility

CLIX vs. USL - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) is 5.30%, while United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP (USL) has a volatility of 10.57%. This indicates that CLIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than USL based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLIXUSLDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.30%

10.57%

-5.27%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

15.64%

23.34%

-7.70%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

20.92%

28.59%

-7.67%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.94%

30.09%

-3.15%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.92%

32.34%

-6.42%

CLIX vs. USL - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than USL's 0.88% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLIX vs. USL - Dividend Comparison

CLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.56%, while USL has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
CLIX
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
0.56%0.46%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.33%
USL
United States 12 Month Oil Fund LP
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLIX and USL have a correlation of -0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

USL has higher volatility (10.57%) compared to CLIX (5.30%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLIX dropped -73.21% vs USL's -89.06%.

On 5-year performance, USL leads with 17.05% vs -6.16% for CLIX. On fees, CLIX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, CLIX has been the lower-risk option at 5.30%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, USL has performed better with a 17.05% return vs -6.16%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

CLIX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 0.88% for USL.

CLIX has the higher dividend yield at 0.56%, compared with 0.00% for USL.

CLIX is categorized as Long-Short, while USL is Oil & Gas. CLIX tracks ProShares Long Online/Short Stores Index, while USL tracks 12 Month Light Sweet Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CLIX and 0.88% for USL.

USL currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.99 vs 0.59), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLIX and USL

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer