CLIX vs. SENT

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CLIX (ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF) and SENT (AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF) are both Long-Short funds - CLIX tracks the ProShares Long Online/Short Stores Index while SENT tracks the Actively Managed. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, CLIX returned -6.40%/yr vs -4.51%/yr for SENT. At a 0.44 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLIX charges 0.65%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for SENT.

Performance

CLIX vs. SENT - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

CLIX

• 1D: -2.35%
• 1M: -6.73%
• YTD: -6.21%
• 6M: -6.37%
• 1Y: 12.94%
• 3Y*: 18.92%
• 5Y*: -6.40%
• 10Y*: —

SENT

• 1D: 0.00%
• 1M: 0.00%
• YTD: 0.00%
• 6M: 0.00%
• 1Y: 0.00%
• 3Y*: -3.03%
• 5Y*: -4.51%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLIX vs. SENT - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
CLIX ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF	-6.21%	32.81%	20.73%	28.97%	-46.73%	-43.38%
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	-6.03%	-18.25%	8.96%

Correlation

The correlation between CLIX and SENT is 0.44, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.20
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.42
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 4, 2021	0.44

The correlation between CLIX and SENT shifts across timeframes, from 0.20 (3 years) to 0.44 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CLIX vs. SENT - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	CLIX	SENT
Consumer Cyclical	94.8%	10.1%
Technology	3.6%	26.2%
Consumer Defensive	1.6%	3.1%
Basic Materials	-	3.0%
Communication Services	-	1.9%
Energy	-	10.3%
Financial Services	-	6.1%
Healthcare	-	24.8%
Industrials	-	14.6%
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

CLIX vs. SENT — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLIX

CLIX Risk / Return Rank: 18
CLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 19
CLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
CLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 18
CLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 17
CLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 18

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLIX vs. SENT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) and AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	CLIX	SENT	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.62	—	—
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.97	—	—
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.12	—	—
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.66	—	—
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	1.81	—	—
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLIX	SENT	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.62	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.24	-0.36	+0.12
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.17	-0.25	+0.42

Drawdowns

CLIX vs. SENT - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLIX drawdown since its inception was -73.21%, which is greater than SENT's maximum drawdown of -30.34%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLIX and SENT.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLIX	SENT	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-73.21%	-30.34%	-42.87%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-19.57%	0.00%	-19.57%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-21.18%	-15.83%	-5.35%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-68.22%	-30.34%	-37.88%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-44.59%	-27.23%	-17.36%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-34.70%	-20.90%	-13.80%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.15%	0.00%	+7.15%

Volatility

CLIX vs. SENT - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) has a higher volatility of 5.08% compared to AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF (SENT) at 0.00%. This indicates that CLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SENT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	CLIX	SENT	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.08%	0.00%	+5.08%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	15.59%	0.00%	+15.59%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	20.89%	0.00%	+20.89%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	26.94%	12.66%	+14.28%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	25.92%	13.32%	+12.60%

CLIX vs. SENT - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than SENT's 1.01% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLIX vs. SENT - Dividend Comparison

CLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.57%, while SENT has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020
CLIX ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF	0.57%	0.46%	0.46%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	1.33%
SENT AdvisorShares Alpha DNA Equity Sentiment ETF	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLIX and SENT in my portfolio?

CLIX and SENT have a correlation of 0.44, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, CLIX or SENT?

CLIX has higher volatility (5.08%) compared to SENT (0.00%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLIX dropped -73.21% vs SENT's -30.34%.

Which ETF is better, CLIX or SENT?

On 5-year performance, SENT leads with -4.51% vs -6.40% for CLIX. On fees, CLIX is cheaper at 0.65% per year. On volatility, SENT has been the lower-risk option at 0.00%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, CLIX or SENT?

Over the 5-year period, SENT has performed better with a -4.51% return vs -6.40%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLIX or SENT?

CLIX is cheaper with a 0.65% expense ratio, compared with 1.01% for SENT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLIX or SENT?

CLIX has the higher dividend yield at 0.57%, compared with 0.00% for SENT.

What is the main difference between CLIX and SENT?

CLIX tracks ProShares Long Online/Short Stores Index, while SENT tracks Actively Managed. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and AdvisorShares. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CLIX and 1.01% for SENT.