PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLIX vs. CLSE
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CLIX vs. CLSE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

CLIX vs. CLSE - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
CLIX
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
-11.46%32.81%20.73%28.97%-38.67%
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
2.96%20.44%35.54%17.54%-3.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLIX achieves a -11.46% return, which is significantly lower than CLSE's 2.96% return.


CLIX

1D
3.23%
1M
-1.05%
YTD
-11.46%
6M
-10.75%
1Y
16.49%
3Y*
17.93%
5Y*
-8.58%
10Y*

CLSE

1D
2.44%
1M
-1.02%
YTD
2.96%
6M
9.11%
1Y
31.47%
3Y*
24.16%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CLIX vs. CLSE - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is lower than CLSE's 1.56% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

CLIX vs. CLSE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLIX
CLIX Risk / Return Rank: 3636
Overall Rank
CLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4040
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 4040
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 3737
Omega Ratio Rank
CLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 2828
Martin Ratio Rank

CLSE
CLSE Risk / Return Rank: 9494
Overall Rank
CLSE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9494
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLSE Sortino Ratio Rank: 9494
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLSE Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
CLSE Calmar Ratio Rank: 9696
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLSE Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLIX vs. CLSE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) and Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLIXCLSEDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

0.72

2.19

-1.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.10

2.84

-1.74

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.40

-0.25

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

0.77

4.14

-3.37

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

2.25

19.56

-17.32

CLIX vs. CLSE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLIX Sharpe Ratio is 0.72, which is lower than the CLSE Sharpe Ratio of 2.19. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLIX and CLSE, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLIXCLSEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.72

2.19

-1.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.32

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

1.25

-1.10

Correlation

The correlation between CLIX and CLSE is 0.35, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

CLIX vs. CLSE - Dividend Comparison

CLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.60%, less than CLSE's 0.92% yield.


TTM202520242023202220212020
CLIX
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
0.60%0.46%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.33%
CLSE
Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF
0.92%0.95%0.93%1.21%0.85%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

CLIX vs. CLSE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLIX drawdown since its inception was -73.21%, which is greater than CLSE's maximum drawdown of -16.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLIX and CLSE.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


CLIXCLSEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.21%

-16.45%

-56.76%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.57%

-7.88%

-11.69%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-68.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-47.70%

-2.53%

-45.17%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.53%

-3.73%

-30.80%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.70%

1.67%

+5.03%

Volatility

CLIX vs. CLSE - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) has a higher volatility of 7.78% compared to Convergence Long/Short Equity ETF (CLSE) at 5.68%. This indicates that CLIX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than CLSE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


CLIXCLSEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.78%

5.68%

+2.10%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

16.32%

10.35%

+5.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.94%

14.47%

+8.47%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

27.03%

13.85%

+13.18%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

26.04%

13.85%

+12.19%