PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLIX vs. ATTR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLIX vs. ATTR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) and Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF (ATTR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLIX achieves a -0.57% return, which is significantly lower than ATTR's 4.79% return.


CLIX

1D
4.48%
1M
6.07%
6M
1.59%
YTD
-0.57%
1Y
12.03%
3Y*
16.69%
5Y*
-4.13%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
4.99%

ATTR

1D
0.40%
1M
0.74%
6M
4.05%
YTD
4.79%
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
ALL TIME*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$612.67K$317.88K$171.71K
$28.27K$42.87K$29.25K

CLIX vs. ATTR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025
CLIX
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
-0.57%-0.52%
ATTR
Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF
4.79%0.53%

Correlation

The correlation between CLIX and ATTR is 0.59, which is moderate. They have sometimes moved together and sometimes differently, sharing some price drivers without tracking each other closely.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 28, 2025

0.59

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLIX vs. ATTR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

CLIX
CLIX Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
CLIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1919
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 1919
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLIX Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
CLIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1818
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLIX Martin Ratio Rank: 1818
Martin Ratio Rank

ATTR

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

CLIX vs. ATTR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF (CLIX) and Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF (ATTR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLIXATTRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.40

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.95

CLIX vs. ATTR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLIX vs. ATTR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLIX drawdown since its inception was -73.21%, which is greater than ATTR's maximum drawdown of -1.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLIX and ATTR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLIXATTRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-73.21%

-1.76%

-71.45%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.57%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-21.18%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-63.54%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-41.26%

0.00%

-41.26%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-34.86%

-0.24%

-34.62%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

8.15%

Volatility

CLIX vs. ATTR - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLIXATTRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.82%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.43%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

22.42%

3.30%

+19.12%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

26.87%

3.30%

+23.57%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.89%

3.30%

+22.59%

CLIX vs. ATTR - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLIX has a 0.65% expense ratio, which is higher than ATTR's 0.63% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLIX vs. ATTR - Dividend Comparison

CLIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.53%, while ATTR has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM202520242023202220212020
ATTR
Arin Tactical Tail Risk ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
CLIX
ProShares Long Online/Short Stores ETF
0.53%0.46%0.46%0.00%0.00%0.00%1.33%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLIX and ATTR have a correlation of 0.59, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, ATTR is cheaper at 0.63% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

ATTR is cheaper with a 0.63% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for CLIX.

CLIX has the higher dividend yield at 0.53%, compared with 0.00% for ATTR.

They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Arin. Their fees differ too: 0.65% for CLIX and 0.63% for ATTR.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLIX and ATTR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer