CLIM vs. DRN
CLIM (Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF) and DRN (Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares) are both REIT funds - CLIM tracks the Climate Global Climate-Resilient REIT Index (CLIMX) while DRN tracks the MSCI US REIT Index (300%). Both are passively managed. Their correlation of 0.92 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CLIM charges 0.90%/yr vs 0.99%/yr for DRN.
Performance
CLIM vs. DRN - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLIM
- 1D
- 0.97%
- 1M
- 4.19%
- 6M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
DRN
- 1D
- 4.01%
- 1M
- 2.28%
- 6M
- 29.05%
- YTD
- 32.23%
- 1Y
- 19.43%
- 3Y*
- 7.67%
- 5Y*
- -10.39%
- 10Y*
- -6.03%
CLIM vs. DRN - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
CLIM Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF | 11.62% |
DRN Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares | 17.35% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLIM and DRN is 0.92, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 12, 2026 | 0.92 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLIM vs. DRN — Risk / Return Rank
CLIM
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
DRN
CLIM vs. DRN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF (CLIM) and Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares (DRN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| CLIM | DRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.11 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.80 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 1.79 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
CLIM vs. DRN - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLIM drawdown since its inception was -6.41%, smaller than the maximum DRN drawdown of -86.32%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLIM and DRN.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLIM | DRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -6.41% | -86.32% | +79.91% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -24.28% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -48.26% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -80.58% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -86.32% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | -62.30% | +62.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -1.45% | -35.21% | +33.76% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 10.88% | — |
Volatility
CLIM vs. DRN - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLIM | DRN | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 16.57% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 32.98% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.95% | 42.26% | -26.31% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.95% | 56.99% | -41.04% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 15.95% | 60.76% | -44.81% |
CLIM vs. DRN - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLIM has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than DRN's 0.99% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLIM vs. DRN - Dividend Comparison
CLIM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.14%, less than DRN's 1.87% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLIM Climate Global - Climate-Resilient REIT Index ETF | 1.14% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
DRN Direxion Daily Real Estate Bull 3x Shares | 1.87% | 2.81% | 2.24% | 2.84% | 2.70% | 4.21% | 1.90% | 2.59% | 3.11% | 0.91% |
Frequently Asked Questions
With a correlation of 0.92, CLIM and DRN move almost identically. Holding both adds very little diversification - you're essentially doubling your position in the same market segment. Choosing one is usually more capital-efficient.
On fees, CLIM is cheaper at 0.90% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CLIM is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.99% for DRN.
DRN has the higher dividend yield at 1.87%, compared with 1.14% for CLIM.
CLIM tracks Climate Global Climate-Resilient REIT Index (CLIMX), while DRN tracks MSCI US REIT Index (300%). They also come from different issuers: Climate Global and Direxion. Their fees differ too: 0.90% for CLIM and 0.99% for DRN.
Find the right allocation for CLIM and DRN
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer