PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLH vs. NVR
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

CLH vs. NVR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) and NVR, Inc. (NVR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLH achieves a 32.30% return, which is significantly higher than NVR's -11.60% return. Over the past 10 years, CLH has outperformed NVR with an annualized return of 19.19%, while NVR has yielded a comparatively lower 14.06% annualized return.


CLH

1D
-0.12%
1M
7.49%
6M
17.47%
YTD
32.30%
1Y
36.20%
3Y*
22.41%
5Y*
27.16%
10Y*
19.19%
ALL TIME*
19.28%

NVR

1D
-0.67%
1M
-0.68%
6M
-14.74%
YTD
-11.60%
1Y
-13.15%
3Y*
1.07%
5Y*
5.67%
10Y*
14.06%
ALL TIME*
18.88%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLH vs. NVR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLH
Clean Harbors, Inc.
32.30%1.89%31.88%52.92%14.38%31.10%-11.25%73.76%-8.95%-2.61%
NVR
NVR, Inc.
-11.60%-10.83%16.83%51.77%-21.94%44.83%7.13%56.28%-30.53%110.20%

Correlation

The correlation between CLH and NVR is 0.27, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.27

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.37

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.34

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 1990

0.16

The correlation between CLH and NVR shifts across timeframes, from 0.16 (all time) to 0.38 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

CLH:

$16.39B

NVR:

$17.40B

EPS

CLH:

$7.41

NVR:

$412.13

PE Ratio

CLH:

41.86

NVR:

15.64

PEG Ratio

CLH:

1.67

NVR:

1.52

PS Ratio

CLH:

2.73

NVR:

2.01

PB Ratio

CLH:

5.92

NVR:

5.40

Total Revenue (TTM)

CLH:

$6.06B

NVR:

$9.66B

Gross Profit (TTM)

CLH:

$1.81B

NVR:

$2.17B

EBITDA (TTM)

CLH:

$1.07B

NVR:

$1.60B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLH vs. NVR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLH
CLH Risk / Return Rank: 8080
Overall Rank
CLH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8282
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLH Sortino Ratio Rank: 7575
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLH Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
CLH Calmar Ratio Rank: 7878
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLH Martin Ratio Rank: 8282
Martin Ratio Rank

NVR
NVR Risk / Return Rank: 2626
Overall Rank
NVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2424
Sharpe Ratio Rank
NVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
NVR Omega Ratio Rank: 2323
Omega Ratio Rank
NVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 3232
Calmar Ratio Rank
NVR Martin Ratio Rank: 3030
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLH vs. NVR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) and NVR, Inc. (NVR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLHNVRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.80

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.27

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.26

0.94

+0.32

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.87

-0.38

+2.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.59

-0.76

+6.35

CLH vs. NVR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLH Sharpe Ratio is 1.33, which is higher than the NVR Sharpe Ratio of -0.47. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLH and NVR, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLH vs. NVR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLH drawdown since its inception was -93.48%, roughly equal to the maximum NVR drawdown of -96.72%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLH and NVR.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLHNVRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-93.48%

-96.72%

+3.24%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-19.45%

-34.88%

+15.43%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-30.86%

-43.94%

+13.08%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-30.86%

-43.94%

+13.08%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-64.51%

-46.13%

-18.38%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.11%

-35.04%

+33.93%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-32.82%

-24.21%

-8.61%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

6.49%

17.30%

-10.81%

Volatility

CLH vs. NVR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Clean Harbors, Inc. (CLH) is 5.18%, while NVR, Inc. (NVR) has a volatility of 10.27%. This indicates that CLH experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than NVR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLHNVRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

5.18%

10.27%

-5.09%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

18.76%

21.94%

-3.18%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

27.48%

27.99%

-0.51%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

28.52%

27.80%

+0.72%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

34.73%

32.10%

+2.63%

Dividends

CLH vs. NVR - Dividend Comparison

Neither CLH nor NVR has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

CLH vs. NVR - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Clean Harbors, Inc. and NVR, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
1.46B
1.83B
(CLH) Total Revenue
(NVR) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

CLH vs. NVR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Clean Harbors, Inc. and NVR, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

20.0%25.0%30.0%JulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
30.5%
19.6%
Portfolio components
CLH - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Clean Harbors, Inc. reported a gross profit of 445.42M and revenue of 1.46B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 30.5%.

NVR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NVR, Inc. reported a gross profit of 360.34M and revenue of 1.83B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 19.6%.

CLH - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Clean Harbors, Inc. reported an operating income of 118.94M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in an operating margin of 8.2%.

NVR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NVR, Inc. reported an operating income of 203.37M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.

CLH - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, Clean Harbors, Inc. reported a net income of 63.20M and revenue of 1.46B, resulting in a net margin of 4.3%.

NVR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jul 2026, NVR, Inc. reported a net income of 198.36M and revenue of 1.83B, resulting in a net margin of 10.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


CLH and NVR have a correlation of 0.27, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

NVR has higher volatility (10.27%) compared to CLH (5.18%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLH dropped -93.48% vs NVR's -96.72%.

CLH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.33 vs -0.47), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLH and NVR

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer