NVR vs. LEN

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about NVR, Inc. (NVR) and Lennar Corporation (LEN).

Performance

NVR vs. LEN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in NVR, Inc. (NVR) and Lennar Corporation (LEN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

NVR vs. LEN - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
NVR NVR, Inc.	-9.64%	-10.83%	16.83%	51.77%	-21.94%	44.83%	7.13%	56.28%	-30.53%	110.20%
LEN Lennar Corporation	-15.15%	-20.80%	-7.32%	66.92%	-20.64%	53.99%	37.97%	42.96%	-37.91%	50.28%

Fundamentals

EPS NVR : $436.66 LEN : $8.10
PE Ratio NVR : 15.09 LEN : 10.72
PS Ratio NVR : 1.99 LEN : 0.65
Total Revenue (TTM) NVR : $10.17B LEN : $34.13B
Gross Profit (TTM) NVR : $2.32B LEN : $6.01B
EBITDA (TTM) NVR : $1.81B LEN : $2.95B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, NVR achieves a -9.64% return, which is significantly higher than LEN's -15.15% return. Over the past 10 years, NVR has outperformed LEN with an annualized return of 14.18%, while LEN has yielded a comparatively lower 7.81% annualized return.

NVR

• 1D: 1.39%
• 1M: -12.34%
• YTD: -9.64%
• 6M: -17.98%
• 1Y: -9.04%
• 3Y*: 5.75%
• 5Y*: 6.61%
• 10Y*: 14.18%

LEN

• 1D: 2.31%
• 1M: -24.06%
• YTD: -15.15%
• 6M: -30.50%
• 1Y: -22.99%
• 3Y*: -3.75%
• 5Y*: -1.37%
• 10Y*: 7.81%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

NVR vs. LEN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

NVR

NVR Risk / Return Rank: 28
NVR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 27
NVR Sortino Ratio Rank: 24
NVR Omega Ratio Rank: 25
NVR Calmar Ratio Rank: 32
NVR Martin Ratio Rank: 29

LEN

LEN Risk / Return Rank: 16
LEN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 15
LEN Sortino Ratio Rank: 16
LEN Omega Ratio Rank: 17
LEN Calmar Ratio Rank: 23
LEN Martin Ratio Rank: 11

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

NVR vs. LEN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVR, Inc. (NVR) and Lennar Corporation (LEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	NVR	LEN	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.33	-0.61	+0.29
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	-0.29	-0.73	+0.44
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	0.97	0.92	+0.05
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.32	-0.56	+0.24
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.79	-1.48	+0.69
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

NVR vs. LEN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current NVR Sharpe Ratio is -0.33, which is higher than the LEN Sharpe Ratio of -0.61. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVR and LEN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	NVR	LEN	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.33	-0.61	+0.29
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.24	-0.04	+0.28
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.45	0.21	+0.24
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.05	0.25	-0.20

Correlation

The correlation between NVR and LEN is 0.49, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

NVR vs. LEN - Dividend Comparison

NVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.30%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
NVR NVR, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
LEN Lennar Corporation	2.30%	1.95%	1.47%	1.01%	1.66%	0.86%	0.82%	0.29%	0.41%	0.25%	0.37%	0.33%

Drawdowns

NVR vs. LEN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum NVR drawdown since its inception was -96.47%, roughly equal to the maximum LEN drawdown of -94.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVR and LEN.

Drawdown Indicators

	NVR	LEN	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-96.47%	-94.28%	-2.19%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-25.44%	-39.87%	+14.43%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.42%	-53.33%	+14.91%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-46.13%	-58.80%	+12.67%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-33.60%	-52.25%	+18.65%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-23.49%	-27.58%	+4.09%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	10.43%	15.13%	-4.70%

Volatility

NVR vs. LEN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for NVR, Inc. (NVR) is 6.51%, while Lennar Corporation (LEN) has a volatility of 10.41%. This indicates that NVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	NVR	LEN	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	6.51%	10.41%	-3.90%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	17.54%	26.44%	-8.90%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	27.81%	37.57%	-9.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	27.40%	34.36%	-6.96%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	31.76%	37.04%	-5.28%

Financials

NVR vs. LEN - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between NVR, Inc. and Lennar Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

NVR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVR, Inc. reported a gross profit of 615.96M and revenue of 2.71B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 22.7%.

LEN - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lennar Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.53B and revenue of 9.37B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 16.3%.

NVR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVR, Inc. reported an operating income of 447.38M and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in an operating margin of 16.5%.

LEN - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lennar Corporation reported an operating income of 666.96M and revenue of 9.37B, resulting in an operating margin of 7.1%.

NVR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, NVR, Inc. reported a net income of 363.82M and revenue of 2.71B, resulting in a net margin of 13.4%.

LEN - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Lennar Corporation reported a net income of 490.24M and revenue of 9.37B, resulting in a net margin of 5.2%.