NVR vs. LEN

In the year-to-date period, NVR achieves a 27.92% return, which is significantly higher than LEN's 14.68% return. Over the past 10 years, NVR has outperformed LEN with an annualized return of 22.02%, while LEN has yielded a comparatively lower 14.72% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for NVR, Inc. (NVR) and Lennar Corporation (LEN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current NVR Sharpe Ratio is 1.83, which is higher than the LEN Sharpe Ratio of 1.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of NVR and LEN, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

NVR has not paid dividends to shareholders, while LEN's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.19%.

The maximum NVR drawdown since its inception was -97.91%, roughly equal to the maximum LEN drawdown of -94.28%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for NVR and LEN. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

The current volatility for NVR, Inc. (NVR) is 5.94%, while Lennar Corporation (LEN) has a volatility of 9.32%. This indicates that NVR experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than LEN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between NVR, Inc. and Lennar Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.