CLDL vs. GUSH
CLDL (Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares) and GUSH (Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares) are both Leveraged Equities funds from Direxion. CLDL is actively managed, while GUSH is passively managed. At a 0.23 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. CLDL charges 0.95%/yr vs 1.17%/yr for GUSH.
Performance
CLDL vs. GUSH - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
CLDL
- 1D
- —
- 1M
- —
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
GUSH
- 1D
- 2.27%
- 1M
- -12.07%
- YTD
- 73.56%
- 6M
- 49.07%
- 1Y
- 75.56%
- 3Y*
- 13.02%
- 5Y*
- 11.54%
- 10Y*
- -36.44%
CLDL vs. GUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLDL Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares | 0.00% | 3.74% | 25.41% | 84.75% | -72.32% | -15.05% |
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 73.56% | -19.39% | -12.73% | -7.23% | 66.47% | 84.47% |
Correlation
The correlation between CLDL and GUSH is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.06 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.16 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.24 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2021 | 0.23 |
The correlation between CLDL and GUSH shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
CLDL vs. GUSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
CLDL
GUSH
Technology
-
Healthcare
-
Communication Services
-
Basic Materials
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
Financial Services
-
-
Industrials
-
-
Real Estate
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
CLDL
GUSH
-
Healthcare
CLDL
GUSH
-
Communication Services
CLDL
GUSH
-
Basic Materials
CLDL
-
GUSH
Consumer Cyclical
CLDL
-
GUSH
-
Consumer Defensive
CLDL
-
GUSH
-
Energy
CLDL
-
GUSH
Financial Services
CLDL
-
GUSH
-
Industrials
CLDL
-
GUSH
-
Real Estate
CLDL
-
GUSH
-
Utilities
CLDL
-
GUSH
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
CLDL vs. GUSH — Risk / Return Rank
CLDL
GUSH
CLDL vs. GUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares (CLDL) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLDL | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 1.37 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 0.17 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.39 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | — | -0.44 | — |
Drawdowns
CLDL vs. GUSH - Drawdown Comparison
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLDL | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | — | -99.98% | — |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -28.94% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -63.59% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -73.64% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -99.94% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | — | -99.79% | — |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | — | -92.92% | — |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.52% | — |
Volatility
CLDL vs. GUSH - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| CLDL | GUSH | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 20.17% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 43.47% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 55.62% | — |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | — | 68.21% | — |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | — | 93.72% | — |
CLDL vs. GUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLDL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than GUSH's 1.17% expense ratio.
Dividends
CLDL vs. GUSH - Dividend Comparison
CLDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than GUSH's 1.44% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLDL Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares | 0.21% | 0.26% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 4.78% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
GUSH Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares | 1.44% | 2.60% | 2.96% | 3.00% | 0.47% | 0.00% | 0.20% | 1.68% | 0.17% | 0.00% | 3.26% |
Frequently Asked Questions
CLDL and GUSH have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, CLDL is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
CLDL is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.
GUSH has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.21% for CLDL.
Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CLDL and 1.17% for GUSH.
Find the right allocation for CLDL and GUSH
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer