PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLDL vs. GUSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

CLDL vs. GUSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares (CLDL) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


CLDL

1D
1M
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

GUSH

1D
2.27%
1M
-12.07%
YTD
73.56%
6M
49.07%
1Y
75.56%
3Y*
13.02%
5Y*
11.54%
10Y*
-36.44%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLDL vs. GUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
CLDL
Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares
0.00%3.74%25.41%84.75%-72.32%-15.05%
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
73.56%-19.39%-12.73%-7.23%66.47%84.47%

Correlation

The correlation between CLDL and GUSH is -0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.16

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.24

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jan 11, 2021

0.23

The correlation between CLDL and GUSH shifts across timeframes, from -0.06 (1 year) to 0.24 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

CLDL vs. GUSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
CLDL
GUSH

Technology

94.5%

-

Healthcare

5.5%

-

Communication Services

1.1%

-

Basic Materials

-

2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

97.2%

Financial Services

-

-

Industrials

-

-

Real Estate

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

CLDL
94.5%
GUSH

-

Healthcare

CLDL
5.5%
GUSH

-

Communication Services

CLDL
1.1%
GUSH

-

Basic Materials

CLDL

-

GUSH
2.9%

Consumer Cyclical

CLDL

-

GUSH

-

Consumer Defensive

CLDL

-

GUSH

-

Energy

CLDL

-

GUSH
97.2%

Financial Services

CLDL

-

GUSH

-

Industrials

CLDL

-

GUSH

-

Real Estate

CLDL

-

GUSH

-

Utilities

CLDL

-

GUSH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLDL vs. GUSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLDL

GUSH
GUSH Risk / Return Rank: 3939
Overall Rank
GUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3838
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
GUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 3838
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLDL vs. GUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares (CLDL) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

CLDL vs. GUSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


CLDLGUSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.37

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.17

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.39

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

-0.44

Drawdowns

CLDL vs. GUSH - Drawdown Comparison


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLDLGUSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-99.98%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.94%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-63.59%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-73.64%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-99.79%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-92.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

12.52%

Volatility

CLDL vs. GUSH - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLDLGUSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

20.17%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

55.62%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

68.21%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

93.72%

CLDL vs. GUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLDL has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is lower than GUSH's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

CLDL vs. GUSH - Dividend Comparison

CLDL's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.21%, less than GUSH's 1.44% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
CLDL
Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares
0.21%0.26%0.00%0.00%0.00%4.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
1.44%2.60%2.96%3.00%0.47%0.00%0.20%1.68%0.17%0.00%3.26%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLDL and GUSH have a correlation of -0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, CLDL is cheaper at 0.95% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

CLDL is cheaper with a 0.95% expense ratio, compared with 1.17% for GUSH.

GUSH has the higher dividend yield at 1.44%, compared with 0.21% for CLDL.

Their fees differ too: 0.95% for CLDL and 1.17% for GUSH.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLDL and GUSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer