PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
CLDL vs. TQQQ
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Key characteristics


CLDLTQQQ
YTD Return35.87%64.66%
1Y Return81.27%105.67%
3Y Return (Ann)-22.89%1.05%
Sharpe Ratio2.032.30
Sortino Ratio2.422.61
Omega Ratio1.321.35
Calmar Ratio1.162.23
Martin Ratio4.789.63
Ulcer Index18.62%12.40%
Daily Std Dev43.75%51.72%
Max Drawdown-83.50%-81.66%
Current Drawdown-55.40%-3.64%

Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.8

The correlation between CLDL and TQQQ is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.

Performance

CLDL vs. TQQQ - Performance Comparison

In the year-to-date period, CLDL achieves a 35.87% return, which is significantly lower than TQQQ's 64.66% return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.


-20.00%0.00%20.00%40.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
49.99%
37.10%
CLDL
TQQQ

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


CLDL vs. TQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both CLDL and TQQQ have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


CLDL
Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares
Expense ratio chart for CLDL: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%
Expense ratio chart for TQQQ: current value at 0.95% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.95%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

CLDL vs. TQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares (CLDL) and ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


CLDL
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for CLDL, currently valued at 2.03, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.03
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for CLDL, currently valued at 2.42, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.42
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for CLDL, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.32
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for CLDL, currently valued at 1.16, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.001.16
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for CLDL, currently valued at 4.78, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.004.78
TQQQ
Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for TQQQ, currently valued at 2.30, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.004.006.002.30
Sortino ratio
The chart of Sortino ratio for TQQQ, currently valued at 2.61, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.002.61
Omega ratio
The chart of Omega ratio for TQQQ, currently valued at 1.35, compared to the broader market1.001.502.002.503.001.35
Calmar ratio
The chart of Calmar ratio for TQQQ, currently valued at 2.23, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.002.23
Martin ratio
The chart of Martin ratio for TQQQ, currently valued at 9.63, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.00100.009.63

CLDL vs. TQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLDL Sharpe Ratio is 2.03, which is comparable to the TQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 2.30. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLDL and TQQQ, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio-0.500.000.501.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.03
2.30
CLDL
TQQQ

Dividends

CLDL vs. TQQQ - Dividend Comparison

CLDL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while TQQQ's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.15%.


TTM2023202220212020201920182017201620152014
CLDL
Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares
0.00%0.00%0.00%4.78%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
TQQQ
ProShares UltraPro QQQ
1.15%1.26%0.57%0.00%0.00%0.06%0.11%0.00%0.00%0.01%0.03%

Drawdowns

CLDL vs. TQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLDL drawdown since its inception was -83.50%, roughly equal to the maximum TQQQ drawdown of -81.66%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLDL and TQQQ. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-80.00%-60.00%-40.00%-20.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-55.40%
-3.64%
CLDL
TQQQ

Volatility

CLDL vs. TQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Daily Cloud Computing Bull 2X Shares (CLDL) is 13.45%, while ProShares UltraPro QQQ (TQQQ) has a volatility of 15.48%. This indicates that CLDL experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than TQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


10.00%15.00%20.00%25.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
13.45%
15.48%
CLDL
TQQQ