CLDAX vs. BIMSX
Compare and contrast key facts about Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX).
CLDAX is managed by Calvert Research and Management. It was launched on Dec 30, 2004. BIMSX is managed by Baird. It was launched on Sep 29, 2000.
Performance
CLDAX vs. BIMSX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
CLDAX vs. BIMSX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLDAX Calvert Core Bond Fund | -0.96% | 7.27% | 1.39% | 5.04% | -13.48% | -2.30% | 14.56% | 20.77% | -5.73% | 9.47% |
BIMSX Baird Intermediate Bond Fund | -0.32% | 6.76% | 3.21% | 5.53% | -8.88% | -1.68% | 7.16% | 6.83% | 0.30% | 2.53% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, CLDAX achieves a -0.96% return, which is significantly lower than BIMSX's -0.32% return. Over the past 10 years, CLDAX has outperformed BIMSX with an annualized return of 3.23%, while BIMSX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.02% annualized return.
CLDAX
- 1D
- 0.51%
- 1M
- -2.55%
- YTD
- -0.96%
- 6M
- 0.08%
- 1Y
- 3.49%
- 3Y*
- 3.08%
- 5Y*
- -0.14%
- 10Y*
- 3.23%
BIMSX
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- -1.48%
- YTD
- -0.32%
- 6M
- 0.79%
- 1Y
- 3.98%
- 3Y*
- 4.25%
- 5Y*
- 1.16%
- 10Y*
- 2.02%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
CLDAX vs. BIMSX - Expense Ratio Comparison
CLDAX has a 0.74% expense ratio, which is higher than BIMSX's 0.55% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
CLDAX vs. BIMSX — Risk / Return Rank
CLDAX
BIMSX
CLDAX vs. BIMSX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX) and Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| CLDAX | BIMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.94 | 1.50 | -0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.35 | 2.23 | -0.88 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.17 | 1.29 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.47 | 2.43 | -0.97 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.61 | 9.20 | -4.59 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| CLDAX | BIMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.94 | 1.50 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.30 | -0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.47 | 0.63 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.82 | 1.09 | -0.27 |
Correlation
The correlation between CLDAX and BIMSX is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
CLDAX vs. BIMSX - Dividend Comparison
CLDAX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.91%, more than BIMSX's 3.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
CLDAX Calvert Core Bond Fund | 3.91% | 4.24% | 4.16% | 3.17% | 1.80% | 6.08% | 5.22% | 3.04% | 3.63% | 3.02% | 7.02% | 2.85% |
BIMSX Baird Intermediate Bond Fund | 3.56% | 3.50% | 3.44% | 2.81% | 1.81% | 1.90% | 3.08% | 2.16% | 2.14% | 1.98% | 1.89% | 2.21% |
Drawdowns
CLDAX vs. BIMSX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum CLDAX drawdown since its inception was -18.88%, which is greater than BIMSX's maximum drawdown of -13.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLDAX and BIMSX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| CLDAX | BIMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.88% | -13.07% | -5.81% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -3.04% | -1.87% | -1.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -18.21% | -13.00% | -5.21% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.88% | -13.07% | -5.81% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -4.35% | -1.48% | -2.87% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -3.92% | -1.59% | -2.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.97% | 0.49% | +0.48% |
Volatility
CLDAX vs. BIMSX - Volatility Comparison
Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX) has a higher volatility of 1.61% compared to Baird Intermediate Bond Fund (BIMSX) at 1.05%. This indicates that CLDAX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than BIMSX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| CLDAX | BIMSX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.61% | 1.05% | +0.56% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 2.56% | 1.67% | +0.89% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.27% | 2.80% | +1.47% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 5.59% | 3.86% | +1.73% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 6.85% | 3.24% | +3.61% |