PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
CLDAX vs. ETH-USD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

CLDAX vs. ETH-USD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX) and Ethereum (ETH-USD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLDAX achieves a -0.27% return, which is significantly higher than ETH-USD's -37.17% return. Over the past 10 years, CLDAX has underperformed ETH-USD with an annualized return of 2.65%, while ETH-USD has yielded a comparatively higher 67.00% annualized return.


CLDAX

1D
0.26%
1M
-0.48%
6M
-0.40%
YTD
-0.27%
1Y
3.94%
3Y*
3.61%
5Y*
-0.47%
10Y*
2.65%

ETH-USD

1D
-2.76%
1M
4.06%
6M
-43.82%
YTD
-37.17%
1Y
-44.74%
3Y*
-0.83%
5Y*
-0.38%
10Y*
67.00%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLDAX vs. ETH-USD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
CLDAX
Calvert Core Bond Fund
-0.27%7.27%1.39%5.04%-13.48%-2.30%14.56%20.77%-5.73%9.47%
ETH-USD
Ethereum
-37.17%-10.91%46.00%90.84%-67.48%398.30%473.88%-1.52%-82.39%8,984.19%

Correlation

The correlation between CLDAX and ETH-USD is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.08

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.03

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.03

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 7, 2015

0.02

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

CLDAX vs. ETH-USD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

CLDAX
CLDAX Risk / Return Rank: 2020
Overall Rank
CLDAX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2222
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CLDAX Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
CLDAX Omega Ratio Rank: 2020
Omega Ratio Rank
CLDAX Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
CLDAX Martin Ratio Rank: 1717
Martin Ratio Rank

ETH-USD
ETH-USD Risk / Return Rank: 6464
Overall Rank
ETH-USD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ETH-USD Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
ETH-USD Omega Ratio Rank: 6161
Omega Ratio Rank
ETH-USD Calmar Ratio Rank: 7272
Calmar Ratio Rank
ETH-USD Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLDAX vs. ETH-USD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX) and Ethereum (ETH-USD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


CLDAXETH-USDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+1.75

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+2.36

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

0.92

+0.27

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.28

-0.66

+1.94

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.54

-1.02

+4.56

CLDAX vs. ETH-USD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current CLDAX Sharpe Ratio is 1.07, which is higher than the ETH-USD Sharpe Ratio of -0.68. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of CLDAX and ETH-USD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

CLDAX vs. ETH-USD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLDAX drawdown since its inception was -18.88%, smaller than the maximum ETH-USD drawdown of -94.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLDAX and ETH-USD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


CLDAXETH-USDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.88%

-94.01%

+75.13%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-3.24%

-67.60%

+64.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-6.09%

-67.60%

+61.51%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-18.21%

-79.35%

+61.14%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-18.88%

-94.01%

+75.13%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.69%

-61.42%

+57.73%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-3.91%

-51.00%

+47.09%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.17%

36.81%

-35.64%

Volatility

CLDAX vs. ETH-USD - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Calvert Core Bond Fund (CLDAX) is 1.11%, while Ethereum (ETH-USD) has a volatility of 13.74%. This indicates that CLDAX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ETH-USD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


CLDAXETH-USDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.11%

13.74%

-12.63%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

3.11%

46.65%

-43.54%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.89%

55.38%

-51.49%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.66%

58.72%

-53.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

6.76%

76.80%

-70.04%

Frequently Asked Questions


CLDAX and ETH-USD have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

ETH-USD has higher volatility (13.74%) compared to CLDAX (1.11%). In terms of maximum drawdown, CLDAX dropped -18.88% vs ETH-USD's -94.01%.

CLDAX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.07 vs -0.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for CLDAX and ETH-USD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer