CLCV vs. SCHV

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

CLCV (Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF) and SCHV (Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF) are both Large Cap Value Equities funds. CLCV is actively managed, while SCHV is passively managed. Their correlation of 0.86 suggests significant overlap in exposure. CLCV charges 0.50%/yr vs 0.04%/yr for SCHV.

Performance

CLCV vs. SCHV - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF (CLCV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, CLCV achieves a 13.65% return, which is significantly lower than SCHV's 15.39% return.

CLCV

• 1D: -0.54%
• 1M: 8.29%
• YTD: 13.65%
• 6M: 16.11%
• 1Y: —
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SCHV

• 1D: 0.09%
• 1M: 5.65%
• YTD: 15.39%
• 6M: 16.00%
• 1Y: 28.49%
• 3Y*: 18.86%
• 5Y*: 10.40%
• 10Y*: 11.50%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

CLCV vs. SCHV - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025
CLCV Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF	13.65%	4.88%
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	15.39%	5.38%

Correlation

The correlation between CLCV and SCHV is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 24, 2025	0.86

Return for Risk

CLCV vs. SCHV — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

SCHV

SCHV Risk / Return Rank: 81
SCHV Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
SCHV Sortino Ratio Rank: 84
SCHV Omega Ratio Rank: 78
SCHV Calmar Ratio Rank: 80
SCHV Martin Ratio Rank: 82

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

CLCV vs. SCHV - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF (CLCV) and Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF (SCHV). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	CLCV	SCHV	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	—	2.69	—
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	—	0.68	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	1.88	0.72	+1.17

Drawdowns

CLCV vs. SCHV - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum CLCV drawdown since its inception was -6.94%, smaller than the maximum SCHV drawdown of -37.08%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for CLCV and SCHV.

Drawdown Indicators

	CLCV	SCHV	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-6.94%	-37.08%	+30.14%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	—	-6.83%	—
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	—	-15.26%	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-19.78%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-37.08%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.54%	0.00%	-0.54%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-1.46%	-3.83%	+2.37%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	—	1.69%	—

Volatility

Volatility by Period

	CLCV	SCHV	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	—	3.09%	—
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	—	8.13%	—
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	12.03%	10.63%	+1.40%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	12.03%	14.51%	-2.48%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	12.03%	16.94%	-4.91%

CLCV vs. SCHV - Expense Ratio Comparison

CLCV has a 0.50% expense ratio, which is higher than SCHV's 0.04% expense ratio.

Dividends

CLCV vs. SCHV - Dividend Comparison

CLCV's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.35%, less than SCHV's 1.76% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
CLCV Crossmark Large Cap Value ETF	0.35%	0.40%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
SCHV Schwab U.S. Large-Cap Value ETF	1.76%	2.02%	2.25%	2.42%	2.37%	1.93%	3.03%	3.02%	3.05%	2.37%	2.65%	2.69%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both CLCV and SCHV in my portfolio?

CLCV and SCHV have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which ETF is better, CLCV or SCHV?

On fees, SCHV is cheaper at 0.04% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF is cheaper, CLCV or SCHV?

SCHV is cheaper with a 0.04% expense ratio, compared with 0.50% for CLCV.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, CLCV or SCHV?

SCHV has the higher dividend yield at 1.76%, compared with 0.35% for CLCV.

What is the main difference between CLCV and SCHV?

They also come from different issuers: Crossmark and Charles Schwab. Their fees differ too: 0.50% for CLCV and 0.04% for SCHV.